starting up applications
> Date: Thu=2C 24 Sep 2009 17:30:29 +0100
>
> On Wednesday 23 September 2009 23:28:03 Darren Upsolla wrote:
>> i want to remove the rudenes and =3D
>> arogence from it - its shit to read
>
> The only rudeness and arrogance I have seen stems entirely f
.edu
> To: abovefrombe...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: FVWM: starting up applications
>
> Darren Upsolla wrote:
>> so is this patch going in - it sucks alot but i need to know before i st=
art=3D
>> rewriting everything pls - i already have removed initfunction just used=
s=3D
>&
o.com=3b fvwm@fvwm.org
> Subject: Re: FVWM: starting up applications
>
> On Mon=2C 21 Sep 2009 23:26:43 +=2C Darren Upsolla
> wrote:
>> <388798.76838...@web32903.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain=3B charset=3D"iso-8859-1"
>> Content-Tra
<388798.76838...@web32903.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date: Mon=2C 21 Sep 2009 15:59:22 -0700
> From: ppu...@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: FVWM: starting up applications
> To: fvwm@fvwm.org
>
>
>>>
<4ab188fe.4050...@math.boisestate.edu>
<18071eea0909211431p36f9a62g9e47a7abc55b7...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
> From: thomas.ada...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon=2
> From: abovefrombe...@hotmail.com
> To: jai...@math.boisestate.edu
> CC: des...@verizon.net; fvwm@fvwm.org
> Subject: Re: FVWM: starting up applications
> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:00:59 +
>
> what do i do to see that happen? contact the author? get him to submit
> patches or
> something el
> From: jai...@math.boisestate.edu
> To: abovefrombe...@hotmail.com
> CC: des...@verizon.net; fvwm@fvwm.org; abovefrombe...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: FVWM: starting up applications
>
> Yes InitFunction, StartFunction, RestartFunction were the older way of
> doing it. Now due to Test () this can a
> From: thomas.ada...@gmail.com
>
> If you want. "Official" has no real meaning, other than the person
> who wrote it knew what they were talking about. So much so, the
> person in question forgot to mention the use of "fvwmstyle" but that's
> likely moot for all the reasons the post makes.
isnt
> From: des...@verizon.net
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:33:29 -0400
>
> Generally you should use InitFunction to start applications:
>
> DestroyFunc InitFunction
> AddToFunc InitFunction
> + I Exec exec xsetroot -solid cyan
> + I Exec exec xterm
> + I Exec exec firefox
oh - but that post says:
"*
> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:03:59 +0200
> From: i92gu...@terra.es
> Search for "StartFunction" in the fvwm man page and you'll eventually find
> all the info you seek. I think the section is called "INITILIZATION" or
> something similar. But a search should
> From: jai...@math.boisestate.edu
>
> StartFunction is ran after fvwm starts up and reads though your config.
> It will run every time fvwm is started. Some things like FvwmModules
> will need to be started every time while others you may only want to run
> on the initial start up or on a restart
hi
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:38:21 -0300
> Subject: Re: FVWM: starting up applications
> From: joqu...@gmail.com
> To: abovefrombe...@hotmail.com
>
> init
sorry what does this mean?
Darren
_
Your
hi all
how best is it to start applications? do i use xsession or initfunction? or
doesnt it matter?
thanks - Darren
_
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
hi,
it has been brought to me attention thomas adam is seriously ill - just thought
you should know
darren
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/
14 matches
Mail list logo
