At Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:51:45 +1000 Stuart Longland
wrote:
>
> On 4/2/24 08:05, Thomas Adam wrote:
> I think this is where we need to consider what the FVWM/Wayland re-write
> would look like. What can be practically brought across under the
> constraints of the `wlroots` back-end (or Wayland
On 4/2/24 08:05, Thomas Adam wrote:
Wayland is not Xlib.
I have been, in my spare time, looking at the XServer code and all the other
libraries surrounding it, and looking at open MRs on Xorg's Gitlab instance --
which means I am going to help keep XServer alive -- which by extension means
fvwm.
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 10:42:37PM -0600, Jason Tibbitts wrote:
> Now, I don't know if you could use the really old-style remote display
> stuff where ssh is not involved. Xwayland really is a proper X server
> so the ability to do it is probably down in there somewhere.
Yes-and-no -- in that, al
Lucio Chiappetti wrote (Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 01:53:29PM +0100):
> I hope to be able to go on with Xorg until I live.
Amen! :-)
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024, Robert Heller wrote:
Afterall, no one needs more then one computer...
I suppose there is a smiley missing after the sentence :-)
My usual way of working (post-COVID, from home) involves usually one or
two ssh sessions on two different remote work machines. Quite occasiona
