Re: FVWM: Multiple virtual desktops on a Xinerama/xrandr screen

2010-02-23 Thread Martin Cracauer
Hans Voss wrote on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:29:27PM +0100: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 14:45, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > Yes, it would work reasonably well in the situation where I watch a > > movie on the non-work screen. ?Make xine sticky, be free to switch the > > left desktops with the work area

Re: FVWM: Multiple virtual desktops on a Xinerama/xrandr screen

2010-02-23 Thread Hans Voss
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 14:45, Martin Cracauer wrote: > Yes, it would work reasonably well in the situation where I watch a > movie on the non-work screen.  Make xine sticky, be free to switch the > left desktops with the work areas. > > It doesn't work well at all for a work situation where the n

Re: FVWM: fvwm development - and interview idea

2010-02-23 Thread David Chanters
On 23 February 2010 11:11, Thomas Adam wrote: > Which documentation?  Something in the man page or larger volumes of > text, such as random guides/tutorials which are floating around on the > 'net?  You might want to try and contribute to the FvwmWiki if it's > nothing too specific and you feel yo

Re: FVWM: fvwm development - and interview idea

2010-02-23 Thread David Chanters
On 23 February 2010 11:08, Thomas Adam wrote: > Ah, I really don't think I can say that I've done much -- I am not > sure what you'd get out of me personally from some sort of interview, > so I'll politely decline.  :) that is disappointing as i recall reading things from you on the internet about

Re: FVWM: Multiple virtual desktops on a Xinerama/xrandr screen

2010-02-23 Thread Martin Cracauer
Hans Voss wrote on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:41:18PM +0100: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 23:51, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > > > If Xorg removes classic dual-head support then the party of having a > > movie on the right screen and switchable desktop on the left is over, > > as is the party of having a

Re: FVWM: Multiple virtual desktops on a Xinerama/xrandr screen

2010-02-23 Thread Hans Voss
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 23:51, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > If Xorg removes classic dual-head support then the party of having a > movie on the right screen and switchable desktop on the left is over, > as is the party of having a bunch of monitoring on the right screen > and switching development d

Re: FVWM: fvwm development - and interview idea

2010-02-23 Thread Thomas Adam
Hello -- On 21 February 2010 20:23, David Chanters wrote: > Hi all > > I've noticed a lot of activity with fvwm lately, and was wondering: > > - is there a way of improving documentation? Which documentation? Something in the man page or larger volumes of text, such as random guides/tutorials w

Re: FVWM: fvwm development - and interview idea

2010-02-23 Thread Thomas Adam
Hello -- On 23 February 2010 00:16, wrote: > They're shy so I'll do a little promotion for them. > > Thomas Adam has been doing most of the recent development. Ah, I really don't think I can say that I've done much -- I am not sure what you'd get out of me personally from some sort of interview