`-,_ `. \ | | / .'_,-'
,,__ `-,_ `. \ | | / .' _,-' __,,
''--..__ `-,_.-"-._ ,-' __..--''
... ''--..__.' `.__..--'' ___
/
On Feb 27, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Michele Orru wrote:
> I think you didn't understood the content of the advisory.
> If there are 10 non-root users in an Ubuntu machine for example,
> if user 1 is using pidgin with OTR compiled with DBUS, then user 2 to 10
> can see what user 1 pidgin conversation.
Th
What about LOIC? An unknown number of Anonymous can't be wrong!
Sent from Android. Because Android is a boss.
On Feb 27, 2012 9:17 PM, "Manuel Moreno" wrote:
> Hi List!!
>
> I made some research about DoS Tools for my regulars PenTesting. What is
> considered the best tool for DoS? I made some t
On 02/27/2012 11:23 PM, devn...@vonage.com wrote:
>
> I believe that clarification is in order.
Indeed it is. The original post mentions a same-user attack
vector which is very misleading as to what the real problem here is.
And it boils down to this:
Once a process sends private info over DBUS
Is Symantec so scared now?
In case you don't know, Symantec had been running an unsupported
version of Peoplesoft eRecruit comfortably for many years while
telling other people to keep their patches up-to-date.
Dr 250
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in
On 02/28/2012 12:14 AM, Dimitris Glynos wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 11:23 PM, devn...@vonage.com wrote:
>>
>> I believe that clarification is in order.
>
> Indeed it is. The original post mentions a same-user attack
> vector which is very misleading as to what the real problem here is.
>
> And it boil
LOIC is old... HOIC is their new toy
2012/2/27 Ramo :
> What about LOIC? An unknown number of Anonymous can't be wrong!
>
> Sent from Android. Because Android is a boss.
>
> On Feb 27, 2012 9:17 PM, "Manuel Moreno" wrote:
>>
>> Hi List!!
>>
>> I made some research about DoS Tools for my regulars
I just thought we where name dropping stuff =(
2012/2/28 Julius Kivimäki :
> I hope you guys are not seriously suggesting these.
>
> -- Edelleenlähetetty viesti --
> Lähettäjä: rancor
> Päiväys: 28. helmikuuta 2012 13.28
> Aihe: Re: [Full-disclosure] Best DoS Tool
> Vastaanott
I hope you guys are not seriously suggesting these.
-- Edelleenlähetetty viesti --
Lähettäjä: rancor
Päiväys: 28. helmikuuta 2012 13.28
Aihe: Re: [Full-disclosure] Best DoS Tool
Vastaanottaja: Ramo
Kopio: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
LOIC is old... HOIC is their new toy
Oh, in that case he should totally use
while true; do wget target; done
28. helmikuuta 2012 14.07 rancor kirjoitti:
> I just thought we where name dropping stuff =(
>
>
>
>
>
> 2012/2/28 Julius Kivimäki :
> > I hope you guys are not seriously suggesting these.
> >
> > -- Edelleenlähetett
-=[ADVISORY---]=-
ImgPals Photo Host Version 1.0 STABLE
Author: Corrado Liotta Aka CorryL [corry...@gmail.com]
-=[---]=-
-=[+] Application: ImgPals Photo Host
-=[+] Version: 1.0 STABLE
-=[+] Vendor's URL: http://www
hping3 --flood
[[ Manuel Moreno ]] @ [[ 27/02/2012 04:35
]]--
> Hi List!!
>
> I made some research about DoS Tools for my regulars PenTesting. What is
> considered the best tool for DoS? I made some test with scapy with god
> results.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2012:023-1
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2012:024
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2012:025
http://www.mandriva.com/security/
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2420-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/Florian Weimer
February 28, 2012
16 matches
Mail list logo
