Hey,
we can then welcome the first cyborg on the list ;-)
Hope all goes well with fixing the knees,
Günther
Douglas Roberts wrote:
To the list at large: apologies for any extra crankiness that has
leaked through of late. Recently I have had the biological equivalent
of two grenades go off:
Hello Doug,
I guess your friend is aware of this:
http://www.hpjava.org/
(a Java wrapper to interface with a native MPI package).
What speaks against this?
> 2. java runs 3-4 times slower than C, C++, Fortran, and machine time
> is expensive, and finally
There have already been many studie
mplexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
>
--
Günther Greindl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.complexitystudies.org
FRIAM
Hello,
I came across Eurekster/Google community/collaborative search engines,
and I thought maybe this would be a good idea for the FRIAM group.
The Eurekster FAQ says in a nutshell what it's about:
"Sometimes, looking for specific information has that needle in a
haystack feeling. Not only can
Hello,
I keep being surprised by this list, when topics which I have been
interested in for some time come cropping up in the discussion here :-)
I would like to second Robert's recommendation for the book Conceptual
Mathematics, a good place to go from there would be:
Category Theory
http://w
rld: develop the
> intellectual communities that you can, take them where they will go, and
> forget the schmucks with the big royalty packages.
>
> You heard if first from me,
>
> Nick
>
>
--
Günther Greindl
Departement of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
Looks cool :-)
http://www.microsoft.com/surface/
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
ng which in reality still eludes our understanding.
Best Regards,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.univie.ac.at/Wissenschaftstheorie/
Blog: http://dao.complexitystudies.org/
Si
acrifice rigor by being intuitive
(on the contrary!).
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.univie.ac.at/Wissenschaftstheorie/
Blog: http://dao.complexitystudies.org/
Site: http://www.complexitystudies.org
===
M 87545
> Phone +1 505 606 1691
> http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/~okram
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> le
s best story IMHO)
> So, even if they remain contradictory, I can retain (and be
> hypocritical about) both of them. But, given the recent conversation
> about networks and cliques, I figured I'd throw this out and see what
> came back. [grin]
As I said, I think they need
es down to which few objectives should the
> large control structures take on? E.g. should abortion laws be handled
> by the states in the US or the feds? What about euthanasia?
> "Universal" health care? Taxes? Defense? Production infrastructure
> (like rails and r
gt;> must somebody take in consideration to decide that is studying a complex
>>> phenomena?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Alfredo CV
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ========
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group lists
table)?
>> Something like Gödel's theorem. ?
How that?
Best,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.univie.ac.at/Wissenschaftstheorie/
Blog: http:
ever been convincingly shown to
exist).
Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence.
Regards,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.univie.ac.at/Wissenschaftstheorie/
Blog: http://dao.complexitys
e total ordering.
If things out of the light cone are not comparable - who cares? - they
don't affect A anyway.
Regards,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.univie.ac.at/Wissenschaftstheorie/
Blog: http://dao.
f you subscribe to indeterminism partial ordering arises.
And to the hammer/nail question: in the macroworld determinism well
established (because even if one assumes totally indet. quantum
fluctuations they would cancel out).
How could you ever get a partial odering in the hammer/nail que
guess you mean "affects the process under investigation causally" and
not "affects causality" (last two words above paragraph)
Former interpretation: we agree. Latter interpretation: we should
discuss ;-))
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
its that nature has imposed us via quantum mechanics:
Regards,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.univie.ac.at/Wissenschaftstheorie/
Blog: http://dao.complexitystudies.org/
Site
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTE
> anxiously we are enveloped, you will easily know that I have
> related nothing which is beyond belief."
> (Girolamo Cardano)
>
> ---
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures
Dear Owen,
> Good to know. I actually like that sort of read .. an "index" into
> the mathematics world and a good motivator.
Yes that is exactly how I view the book: an index and a motivator!
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
Univ
nuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFHe98oZeB+vOTnLkoRAjKfAJ0fFwhcKlZulDmkoXZaDKb3a/b76QCfXjC5
> WZaDT213cIPPOhP1bRH8rQE=
> =cWA0
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> ===
Springer has a new introductory book on complexity out:
http://www.springer.com/west/home?SGWID=4-102-22-173664720-0&teaserId=470893&CENTER_ID=161746
(Complexity Explained by Peter Erdi)
Has anyone had a chance to look inside?
Regards,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philo
t the book.
> I can't wait to read what he has to say.
>
> Jennifer H. Watkins
> International and Applied Technology Division
> Los Alamos National Laboratory
> Los Alamos, NM 87545
> Phone +1 505 663 5515
> http://public.lanl.gov/jhw
>
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2
t I meant - computability of course raises different
associations, I was sloppy in the formulation.
> I do believe that there are certain processes in reality
> that are noncomputable in terms of what we now call "computation".
Ok for the computability issues - I can'
stood Bayes intuitively.
No kidding - Eliezer's tutorial is great (play around with the slides).
Of course, this does not mean that the problem of the priors has been
solved ;-))
Regards,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL
-795-4844
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] explorations: www.synapse9.com
> “in the last 200 years the amount of change that once needed a century of
> thought now takes just five weeks”
>
>
>
>
> ============
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>
Dear Glen,
>> The principal claim of Rosen - that life is not mechanically emulable -
>> is shown to be false by the second recursion theorem
>>
> I disagree. I don't believe that theorem refutes RR's claim, which I
> prefer to think of as "non-well-founded sets cannot be realized". But,
> I ad
&s=books&qid=1208976075&sr=8-1
(Very expensive :-((, maybe your library has it?)
Bruno Marchal (http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/) alerted me to the
astounding and beautiful consequences of mechanism applied throughout;
and the philosophical chasms opening when not doing so.
Ch
> OK. So RR makes a prohibitive claim ... something like "living systems
> cannot be accurately modeled with a UTM because MR systems cannot be
> realized". And you are refuting that claim by a counter-claim that MR
> systems _can_ be realized, emphasizing that the recursion theorem is
> crucial
s the recursion theorem, then we could say
> that one or the other (Rosen's or the recursion theorem) is refuted.
Ack, I also think that the problem is that Rosen's ideas are not
formalized enough to present a contradiction.
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Departm
Hi,
I know that some people on this list like to read Greg Egan;
as I am now nearly finished with his books (Incandescence is upcoming in
May I think, but that's only one more ;-) I would be interested if
anyone can recommend authors similar in style.
I especially like Egan's idea-centered appro
xamples of abuses, I would be interested?
> to Wells' paper. Then make fun of me if I haven't read it, yet.
> That'll coerce me into reading it.
OK :-))
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www
http://reprap.org/bin/view/Main/WebHome
still a bit expensive, though ;-)
Regards,
Günther
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www
Review Article of possible interest to some of you
(subscription required):
Annual Review of Biophysics
Vol. 37: 289-316 (Volume publication date June 2008)
(doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558)
The Protein Folding Problem
Ken A. Dill Et Al
http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10
Related to the article I sent before, here's a game where you can
actually play and aid science:
http://fold.it/portal/adobe_main/
From the website:
What other good stuff am I contributing to by playing?
Proteins are found in all living things, including plants. Certain types
of plants are g
Hi,
sounds scary. What I find strange is this: they say at the beginning of
the paper:
There are many sources of ‘‘dirty power’’ in today’s
electrical equipment. Examples of electrical equipment
designed to operate with interrupted current flow are light
dimmer switches that interrupt the curren
ctures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.univie.ac.at/Wissenschaftstheorie/
Blog: http://dao.complexitystudies.or
able to recognize itself in a mirror. I'm
> particularly groping for something beyond a simple notion of whether an
> observer is 'typical' in some given environment and more how
> observerness emerges and operates in coevolutionary or epigenetic
> situations.
Would the
Hey,
the book has already crossed my radar but I have not had the occasion
to read it, as I'm drowning in books already.
But I would like to queue in with Owen as to interest in FRIAMer
comments if some of you have already read it?
Cheers,
Günther
Owen Densmore wrote:
> Has anyone read this cr
s Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
> Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.univie.ac.at/Wissenschaftstheorie/
Blog: http://dao.complexityst
matizing the theory.
Look at Einstein for instance: the ideas he had very hanging around
"intuitively" for quite some time; but he mathematized it, it went
experimental, and voila, scientifically confirmed and accepted.
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of
icate (drawing
on the other person's experience of living in the same world as you
actually).
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.univie.ac.at/Wissenschaftstheorie/
Blog: http://dao.comple
Steve Smith wrote:
> Some of us, we are
> Just a few syllables
> short of a haiku
liked this one :-)
cheers,
günther
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, uns
ure in an embedded (in the math
structure) cognitive system (human etc) (which is of course part of the
larger reality -> it is simply a nested structure with some parts
mirroring other parts).
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienn
I you are interested in models of the self, this could
be for you:
Metzinger, T. Being No One. The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. MIT
Press, 2003
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http
d that will include philosophy of math and
traditional metaphysics).
Reality is not confusing. Our mental models are often not in tune with
reality, and that is what is confusing.
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
arithmetic not; in short: you need addition and
multiplication in your arithmetic -> with this you can construct gödel
numbers, define recursion, and get your (first) incompleteness theorem,
from which second follows easily.
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Sc
recise ideas", if you like :-))
Apart from that, I think a lot of earnest thinking by oneself is
necessary - you have to have a genuine interest in these things.
Knowledge and insight come from "diu noctuque incubando" (by brooding
day and night), a saying Nietzsche ascribed to
llage
idiot, and _real_ superintelligences:
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/05/my-childhood-ro.html
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.complexitystudies.org/
Thesis: http://www.complexitystu
nsights will happen
> anyway in effect says it doesn't have to.
What do you mean by this? "insights happen anyway => thats why they
don't?" I think I am misunderstanding you.
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University o
n this way too.
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.complexitystudies.org/
Thesis: http://www.complexitystudies.org/proposal/
FRIAM Applied Co
Glen,
> Math (which is more than formal systems) can handle loopy inference
> quite well. But the modeling vernacular can NOT handle it so well. And
which mathematics is not a formal system? If it's not formal it's not
math I would say.
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Grein
www.friam.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
ind, peano, russell etc) is assumed in the book)
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.complexitystudies.org/
Thesis: http://www.complexitystudies.org/proposal/
==
x of the matter.
So, we have the hypothesis that in the end it all boils down to formal
systems (=mechanism; which is nicely defined via computability);
or that it somehow goes beyond the formal - but what should this be? I
wonder...
Of course, computability (I equate it with mechanism here
Hi,
> This doesn't mean strictly remaining with restraints belonging under the
> heading of that horrible word "reductionism".
Why do you think that the word is horrible? (be specific please ;-)
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
Jack,
ok, I phrased my question badly. To avoid any nitpicking ;-), I would
like to know what you mean by this:
"This doesn't mean strictly remaining with restraints belonging under
the heading of that horrible word "reductionism".
Cheers,
Günther
=
up
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.complexitystudies.org/
Thesis: http://www.complexitystudies.org/proposal/
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group lis
gh it's actually
a compliment.
Reductionism is about understanding what's going on under the hood. I
don't know why people oppose this.
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.com
implisctic and egotistic manner.
Why is reductionism simplistic and egotistic? What would a
non-simplistic and non-egotistic explanation be?
And since when are theories like QED simple, despite being reductionist?
*confused* Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
Uni
do not enjoy a privileged position.
But that is another matter which I am just developing (so I can't write
about it yet *grin*)
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.complexitystudies.org/
Thesis: ht
al of
understanding the world.
Cheers,
Günther
--
Günther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://www.complexitystudies.org/
Thesis: http://www.complexitystudies.org/proposal/
Hello everybody,
I've been lurking on the list for quite some
time now, and have always enjoyed reading the interesting
discussions going on here (this is definitely my favourite
mailing list :-)
So I guess it's time to join the fray.
My academic background is law and computer science.
In Octobe
Hi Owen,
if I may recommend a book:
Complexity: Hierarchical Structures and Scaling in Physics (Cambridge
Nonlinear Science Series)
by
Remo Badii, Antonio Politi
Here the amazon link:
http://tinyurl.com/eb78d
Site of the author:
http://www.geocities.com/badii_remo/
Despite the title, the bo
Jochen Fromm wrote:
>
> Much more interesting than the bad
> complexity book from Remo Badii and Antonio Politi that
> gets dusty somehwere on my bookshelf. Even if it is
> from Cambridge University Press, the Badii and Politi
> book is one of those disappointing books that you put down
> ag
Wow. I say no more. (Watch the first video!)
http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2006/07/24/video_display_interface_of_the.htm
as tinyurl:
http://tinyurl.com/fqbfz
Regards,
Günther
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Friday
I agree absolutely, Robert, would have written the same
had you not beat me to it ;-)
I think "complexity" is not a science but a way to approach
problems.
Traditional science asks: what does my discipline have to say to
this and that?
"Complexity scientists" ask: we have a concrete phenomenon he
I abolutely agree. Also, I think it's a plus
that the people on this list have a diverse background.
After all, complexity science is interdisciplinarity
par excellence. So, whatever results from this collaboration
could very well be a good foundation for further work.
Regards,
Günther
Jochen Fro
70 matches
Mail list logo