I certainly would be interested. I have issues with Claude's work and what
I think is its misconstrued application and definition, at least beyond
physics.
-tj
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Nicholas Thompson <
nickthomp...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Owen,
>
> We could do a Wedtech in September
Tying into another thread, one of the reasons I like gmail is that it was
the first mail app that got me away from the folder paradigm. I don't use
folders in gmail and sparingly use tags. Gmails search is good enough to
help me find any email I need from a backlog of several years worth.
Interest
Thoughts on Apps vs. Web Apps / Apple approach vs. Google approach
Apple seems definitely on the right track with the iCloud, but I think, as
Owen's email points out, that is because they are rapidly adapting to the new
hardware ecology. In a world where everyone has one or two computers, full
fun
With the latest spate of break-ins, Google and Playstation being well
reported, I'm thinking We've Got A Problem, Houston!
I'm not expert enough to be sure how these attacks are done .. likely
not by one-by-one account break-ins. None the less, I'm thinking
Passwords Are A Thing Of The Past.
So:
I've always said that there's no such thing as a secure computer. You
can disconnect from the web, disconnect from the power supply, lock it
in a bomb proof shelter and throw away the key. But if someone really
really wants to get in they will find that key.
So we try to make it not worth wh
Thread HiJacking Alert:
What about the world in which you can wake up in the morning and discover that
your credit company has been hacked? A million Citibank accounts were
compromised yesterday. Is this relevant to the cloud/ground discussion, or
shall I start my own thread on whether per
Is that an experimental result, or what you think it should be ?
Joe
On 6/10/11 11:42 PM, Russ Abbott wrote:
Right. Each is about 333.
/-- Russ Abbott/
/_/
/ Professor, Computer Science/
/ California State University, Los Angeles/
/ Google voic
The numbers I sent are experimental results. But it's easy to show that if
one picks three numbers at random, the probability that the third will be
greater (smaller) than the other two is 1/3. The argument is similar to
the argument about the middle number.
For any three numbers one of them mus
