This was stuck in my mailtool, waiting for me to complete a closing
sentence and hit send...
On 1/22/24 12:46 PM, glen wrote:
Words matter: how ecologists discuss managed and non-managed bees and
birds
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-022-04620-2
Words do matter, acutely in
Words matter: how ecologists discuss managed and non-managed bees and birds
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-022-04620-2
I'm continuing this thread because I really want to classify types of ad
hominem. The most obvious bifurcation is human vs. source ... so against the
human ve
by-appointment yet vetted by prior election.
>
> From: Friam mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> on
> behalf of glen mailto:geprope...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Monday, January 8, 2024 at 7:08 AM
> To: friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com> <mailto:friam@re
on behalf of glen
Date: Monday, January 8, 2024 at 7:08 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] "SSRN-id3978095.pdf" was shared with you
The argument seems pretty clear to me. "Officer" is jargonal, not intuitive.
Were I to read it charitably, I'd agree. A
Thanks, Glen. It's great to hear your "voice" on this topic. I am
particularly grateful for the ad hominem stuff. I want to read the
district Judge's opinion but there are things I want to do more and age is
really catching up with me.
Take care. The world needs you.
Nick
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024
The argument seems pretty clear to me. "Officer" is jargonal, not intuitive.
Were I to read it charitably, I'd agree. Appointees are not elected. Electees should have
more leeway than appointees ... like the difference between an elected Sheriff and her
deputies. But like all dichotomies, this
