I would have said https://arxiv.org/. People were kinda freaking out over
pre-prints during the advent of covid19. But sheesh. The citation rate for
pre-pints in ai is staggering. Were one on the red team, they might langchain
gpt4, bard, et al into a collaborative team submitting, say, a billi
Are we just a blip on the radar of evolving intelligence? Like, in a few
hundred years, will some super-smart robot be looking back at us and
saying, "Oh yeah, those primitive humans, they were our ancestors!"
I mean, imagine if we create these AI beings and they just roll their eyes
at us like te
My reaction to the prepper revelation was to seriously question his
rationality. Maybe he's just prepping because the other styles of
conspicuous consumption didn't appeal to him. Maybe he's running OpenAI
because it was the most prestigious gig he could get. Doesn't really have
a rational bone
IDK. I still haven't read the Dawn of Everything ... or much of anything from
that domain at all. But this article tweaked me:
Revealed: modern humans needed three tries – and 12,000 years – to colonise
Europe
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/may/07/revealed-modern-humans-needed-three-t
What David said.
On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 8:49 AM Prof David West wrote:
> The opinion of an "advanced layman."
>
> I claim the status because my Computer Science MS was in AI. My first
> professional publication was in *AI Magazine*, then the journal of record
> for the discipline. I have appeare
Yes. The point of quoting the part of the article I quoted, as Marcus noted,
Altman exhibits 2 conflicting behaviors: 1) optimism about AI and 2) prepping
for apocalypse. One *could* give him the benefit of the doubt. People are
complex. He's extracted plenty of rent from the earth. So why not
The opinion of an "advanced layman."
I claim the status because my Computer Science MS was in AI. My first
professional publication was in *AI Magazine*, then the journal of record for
the discipline. I have appeared on panels with Herbert Simon, Marvin Minsky,
and Herbert Dreyfus at AI confere
It doesn't have to be either/or. I suspect most likely a mix of the two
will evolve as is the case with the whole Digital Revolution.
TJ
===
Tom Johnson
Inst. for Analytic Journalism
Santa Fe, New Mexico
505-577-6482
===
On Mon, May 8, 2023, 9:43 PM Pieter
People have different ideas about AI. Naomi Klein thinks that the idea that
AI will solve all our problems is a big joke. She thinks the tech people
are trying to trick us! She thinks AI is not just a tool but also a
creation of the people who made it. Naomi is afraid that if we keep
believing in t
He's not lying, he is running his softmax function at a higher temperature to
collect more samples in the vicinity of the truth.
> On May 8, 2023, at 12:50 PM, glen wrote:
>
> AI machines aren’t ‘hallucinating’. But their makers are.
> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/08/ai-m
AI machines aren’t ‘hallucinating’. But their makers are.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/08/ai-machines-hallucinating-naomi-klein
Is all of this overly dramatic? A stuffy and reflexive resistance to exciting
innovation? Why expect the worse? Altman reassures us: “Nobody wants
11 matches
Mail list logo
