s.clarku.edu/nthompson/
From: Friam On Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 8:43 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] hot streaks
On 9/22/21 3:18 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
Nick --
How much of the fleet do you need to examine to make this metaphor float?
On 9/22/21 3:18 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> Nick --
>
> How much of the fleet do you need to examine to make this metaphor float?
>
> How many scientific journals are published globally per year? No one
> knows how many scientific journals there are, but several estimates
> point to around 30,000
sday, September 22, 2021 11:59 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group mailto:friam@redfish.com> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] hot streaks
I think it actually all makes sense in a Peircian way. First we thought papers
meant proven work, then published papers, then peer revi
gt;
>
>
>
>
>
> n
>
>
>
> Nick Thompson
>
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
>
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Roger Critchlow
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 22, 2021 11:59 AM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Com
Is this an example of epiphenomena (in the sense of episystems)?
On 9/22/21 9:58 AM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> I think it actually all makes sense in a Peircian way. First we
> thought papers meant proven work, then published papers, then peer
> reviewed published papers, then peer reviewed publis
nthompson/>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
From: Friam On Behalf Of Roger Critchlow
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 11:59 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] hot streaks
I think it actually all makes sense in a Peircian way. Firs
I think it actually all makes sense in a Peircian way. First we thought
papers meant proven work, then published papers, then peer reviewed
published papers, then peer reviewed published papers with citations, then
peer reviewed published papers with citations and no dumpster fires on
social meda.
Overall, the wealthy (senior authors) in this scenario are as with real money.
They are: 1) the ones who create cranks to turn (some random topic to torture
endlessly), and 2) those that employ people to turn them on their behalf.
But, if someone does find a way to turn them into integral un
For any feeling charitable, send checks to:
Jon Zingale
620 1/2 Alto Street
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfi
It's preposterous to say that citations are worth $100,000 each. That
makes me a multi-multi-millionaire. Did you read the article, Roger? What
can that possibly mean?
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505
505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021, 2:35 PM Roger C
Barabási is getting the Gelman treatment today:
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2021/09/21/albert-laszlo-barabasi-is-underpaid-by-a-lot/
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2021/09/21/more-on-that-claim-that-scientific-citations-are-worth-10-each/
Turns out that Gelman reviewed Burs
May be related to Barabasi's ideas of work (and many other phenomena)
coming in discrete clumps in his 2010 book "Bursts"
https://barabasi.com/book/bursts
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021, 12:16 PM Roger Critchlow wrote:
> Open access at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25477-8
>
> Across a ran
Open access at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25477-8
Across a range of creative domains, individual careers are characterized by
hot streaks, which are bursts of high-impact works clustered together in
close succession. Yet it remains unclear if there are any regularities
underlying t
13 matches
Mail list logo
