This was one of the best threads in a while IMO. I was still studying
the background material from the OP moral foundations theory (MFT) and
the flagship study as I caught up with the evolving thread. I am still
fascinated by the MFT work, etc... The AOC/Warren v Zuckerberg/FB
examples were ver
Yeah, well said. I guess I hope the same thing.
On 10/28/19 12:25 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> I hope that is not true. I hope that the swapping abilities become a
> selective advantage in civilization. I think it is along the lines of your
> advocacy for role playing. The folks who don't w
Glen writes:
< If we've spent our experienced years building and cleaning up occult
infrastructure and we aren't replaced by people with similar Necker-cube
swapping abilities, our legacy will be whatever mode dominates as we crash:
hegemonic infrastructure or bursts of throwaway Bash code. >
Very cool way to frame it! It well captures how I think of Pelosi, in contrast
to AOC and Warren. Pelosi seems capable of maintaining multiple ways of
operating to meet objectives that might seem to conflict otherwise. And I agree
that *experienced* people do this ... have learned to do this ...
57 AM
To: FriAM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] MoNA
Hm. OK. If I try my best to steel-man an argument, I'd have to say the only
thing ingrained is the tendency to think systemically (democrats) versus the
tendency to think causally (republicans). I can posit this is ingrained in
their biology, eithe
Hm. OK. If I try my best to steel-man an argument, I'd have to say the only
thing ingrained is the tendency to think systemically (democrats) versus the
tendency to think causally (republicans). I can posit this is ingrained in
their biology, either learned as they're reared or is some kind of g
pplied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] MoNA
I’m still stuck on “root mean square”. L 2, Brute?
--Barry
On 28 Oct 2019, at 12:53, Frank Wimberly wrote:
To me "RMS" denotes Richard M. Stallman but that's because I'm old I guess.
---
Frank
team that can get it done, or the `deep state' will eventually make a move.
Marcus
From: Friam on behalf of uǝlƃ ☣
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 11:12 AM
To: FriAM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] MoNA
Yeah, Warren's stunt was nice, too.
[https://www.cnet.com
Yeah, Warren's stunt was nice, too.
[https://www.cnet.com/news/warren-runs-a-false-facebook-ad-to-protest-false-facebook-ads/]
Again, though, this seems to be about rhetoric, not ingrained morality. AOC and
Warren are *arguing* one point, Cambridge Analytica et al are arguing another
point. Tru
I’m still stuck on “root mean square”. L 2, Brute?
--Barry
On 28 Oct 2019, at 12:53, Frank Wimberly wrote:
To me "RMS" denotes Richard M. Stallman but that's because I'm old I
guess.
---
Frank Wimberly
My memoir:
https://www.amazon.com/author/frankwimberly
M
And,
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/new-mexico/articles/2019-09-16/santa-fe-institute-received-275-000-through-jeffrey-epstein
From: Friam on behalf of uǝlƃ ☣
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 10:57 AM
To: FriAM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] MoNA
Yes. RMS
Yes. RMS:
https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/17/20870050/richard-stallman-resigns-mit-free-software-foundation-epstein
On 10/28/19 9:53 AM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
> To me "RMS" denotes Richard M. Stallman but that's because I'm old I guess.
--
☣ uǝlƃ
===
rom: Friam on behalf of uǝlƃ ☣
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 10:45 AM
To: FriAM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] MoNA
I doubt it. I forget who the aphorism is attributed to, but "Never ascribe
malice when incompetence will suffice" comes to mind. These subversive
approaches may simply stretch
To me "RMS" denotes Richard M. Stallman but that's because I'm old I guess.
---
Frank Wimberly
My memoir:
https://www.amazon.com/author/frankwimberly
My scientific publications:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2
Phone (505) 670-9918
On Mon, Oc
I doubt it. I forget who the aphorism is attributed to, but "Never ascribe
malice when incompetence will suffice" comes to mind. These subversive
approaches may simply stretch the competencies and energy of the people who
would otherwise carry them out. It's possible that it's simply too difficu
ensoring.
Because if it were happening all the time, then folks like Spencer would be
absent from the world.
Marcus
From: Friam on behalf of glen∈ℂ
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 8:16 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] MoNA
Well, that's a
Well, that's a reasonable heuristic. But there are complications. A good example might be the
"preemptive strike", when you perceive a slow-growing threat, some of which may have a
noisy signal prone to misinterpretation. (Thinking Iraq invasion.) E.g. our home grown domestic
terrorists like Ri
It's not that deep. Someone is (physically) attacking you for some bonkers
reason? It's fine (and even encouraged some say) to some how deffend your
self. So there you go- a not all that deep example
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 3:40 PM glen wrote:
> I'm neck deep into an argument with a friend about
I'm neck deep into an argument with a friend about the ethical use of violence
(e.g. punching nazis) and continue finding rabbit holes, which my dilletante
homunculus prevents me from diving into, that look like "sophistry" (air quotes
indicating the abused meaning, not the proper philosophical
19 matches
Mail list logo
