Re: [FRIAM] Fwd: RE: Doxastic logic - Wikipedia

2017-09-22 Thread Marcus Daniels
ning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Fwd: RE: Doxastic logic - Wikipedia On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Frank Wimberly mailto:wimber...@gmail.com>> wrote: [ ... ] Beyond that, there are problems with statements that are apparently analytic. Every black dog is

Re: [FRIAM] Fwd: RE: Doxastic logic - Wikipedia

2017-09-22 Thread Roger Critchlow
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Frank Wimberly wrote: [ ... ] > Beyond that, there are problems with statements that are apparently > analytic. Every black dog is a dog but is every iron horse a horse? Even > "black dog" may mean something other than a dog in some context. Human > language i

[FRIAM] Fwd: RE: Doxastic logic - Wikipedia

2017-09-22 Thread Frank Wimberly
Frank Wimberly Phone (505) 670-9918 -- Forwarded message -- From: "Frank Wimberly" Date: Sep 22, 2017 8:25 AM Subject: RE: [FRIAM] Doxastic logic - Wikipedia To: "Thompson, Nicholas" Cc: It depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is. Seriously, I'll attempt a better answer

[FRIAM] Fwd: RE: Doxastic logic - Wikipedia

2017-09-22 Thread Frank Wimberly
Frank Wimberly Phone (505) 670-9918 -- Forwarded message -- From: "Frank Wimberly" Date: Sep 22, 2017 8:55 AM Subject: RE: [FRIAM] Doxastic logic - Wikipedia To: "Thompson, Nicholas" Cc: OK, more seriously. If "is" means "=" then it's symmetric and you are correct. But if it me