ay, March 27, 2021 1:31 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Friday Fodder
Often it seems like you are more interested in compendiums or holding (virtual)
lecture series than you are in just jumping in to the literature. These
experts are developing
riday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Friday Fodder
Not to worry, Gary. Just a little collaborators’ tiff. Eric has done more to
support my staying alive in old age than any other individual human being. He
can call me anything he wants. The other big
rday, March 27, 2021 7:43 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group mailto:friam@redfish.com> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Friday Fodder
In Friday's meeting I apologized to Jon that I hadn't given him a proper reply
to his interesting prods, but that Nick's comm
gt; N
>
>
>
> Nick Thompson
>
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
>
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Eric Charles
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 27, 2021 7:43 AM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
ay, March 27, 2021 7:43 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Friday Fodder
In Friday's meeting I apologized to Jon that I hadn't given him a proper reply
to his interesting prods, but that Nick's comments had somehow mentally blocked
ience is direct and calling it "direct" is
> wasted breath. There, EricC, I have finally said it!
>
> Still pondering your last contribution to the writing thread.
>
> N
> Nick Thompson
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
>
eption is direct, it comes only to the prepared mind and
> there are an infinity of fluxes that must go unnoticed.
>
> Nick
>
> Nick Thompson
> thompnicks...@gmail.com
> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Friam On Behalf O
FWIW, I interpret such flux as fascial. My skin is not made of an infinity of
points, it is a sheet that confers aggregate information. The prepared mind,
the situated body, whatever. There is some limited subject, limited in its
ability to know what there is to know, but embodied in the world
none
...@gmail.com
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of jon zingale
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 9:41 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Friday Fodder
The idea isn't all that clear to me. I am still trying to understand the
va
The idea isn't all that clear to me. I am still trying to understand the
various concepts and perspectives in play. What follows is a first-order
attempt. I can sympathize with the need for Gibsonians to disambiguate
experience. There is a need to state direct experience because the
discussion is h
n Behalf Of jon zingale
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 4:02 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Friday Fodder
"""
I feel like I completely understand your problem, but cannot solve it. You
point to, what is for me, the most bemusing problem in evolutionary theory,
the
"""
I feel like I completely understand your problem, but cannot solve it. You
point to, what is for me, the most bemusing problem in evolutionary theory,
the evolution of natural selection. Given the developmental entanglement of
traits, how do they become modules for the purpose of selection.
t: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 9:12 AM
To: friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com>
Subject: [FRIAM] Friday Fodder
Because I left before it ended, I have no idea how the spandrel discussion
ended. Nick requested an explanation/elaboration/justification for my
continued skepticism/resistance (
I read, long ago and who knows where, that the issue came from the director,
and probably more directly from the continuation editor — there were visual
'responses' from females in this scene and in the bar scene from the first one
where they looked at his crotch and were "impressed" and "lustfu
Put a space laser into orbit, like, you know...
-Original Message-
From: Friam On Behalf Of u?l? ???
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 10:29 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Friday Fodder
LoL! Can you imagine how insecure you'd have to be to insist the producers CGI
l
LoL! Can you imagine how insecure you'd have to be to insist the producers CGI
larger genitalia for you? As Womanizer-in-Chief, I'd buy that he did. But hell,
maybe the Governator would have been fine with anatomical correctness but the
director insisted that modern masculinity demands porn star
I know the scene whereof you speak. CGI.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021, at 11:08 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
> Bit of a tangent, but...
>
>> Consider Arnold in the role of Terminator. He managed to convey a lot of
>> menace and dominance simply from size and overall shape; never once
>> brandishing his pe
Bit of a tangent, but...
> Consider Arnold in the role of Terminator. He managed to convey a lot of
> menace and dominance simply from size and overall shape; never once
> brandishing his penis to intimidate anyone.
Having recently watched the theatrical release of Terminator, I was
surprised t
Thompson
thompnicks...@gmail.com <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
From: Friam On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 9:12 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: [FRIAM] Friday Fodder
Because I left before it ended, I have no idea h
Because I left before it ended, I have no idea how the spandrel discussion
ended. Nick requested an explanation/elaboration/justification for my continued
skepticism/resistance (other than being willfully obstinate for no reason) to
the notion of spandrel. Hence the following — elaborated beyond
20 matches
Mail list logo
