*"It seems like ZKPs (perhaps including tech like homomorphic encryption)
hint at a more elegant construct for demonstrating one's authenticity while
preserving one's place on a spectrum between autonomy or panmixia."*
Sure. I can imagine presenting a 4-coloring (AGCT) of a familiar sequence
and t
Right, which came on the tail end of the argument about anti-vaxers' claims of
bodily sovereignty. Part of Kim's argument *for* the vaccine mandates is that
one's self doesn't really stop at one's skin. We're permeable to, participants
in, the molecular/organismal stew in which we swim. In this
On one of my last visits to Cleveland, I had the pleasure of meeting a
young savant named Jack. Besides hosting a late-night radio show on
WCSB[𝄞] and performing afternoon noise music at a near-westside bar[𝄢],
he talks nearly non-stop, and almost singularly, and with encyclopedic
scope and depth,
At VFriam with Glen and Jon. as I came into their discussion on identity,
I brought up Self-Sovereignty Identity as something we're designing for in
our day job with Realtime.Earth.
If we classify Web 1.0 (1993-2005) roughly simple pages with databases and
forms. Web 2.0 (~2005-2015) was an era o
Will Glen Ropella be the next Henrietta Lacks?
I was reluctant to offer my DNA to the giant
commercial-profiteering-cloud-in-the-sky and only did so as a mild act
of "bravery", just as I do when I leave my wifi open and doors unlocked
and keys in my vehicle. The big difference.
I'm always int
So dismissive of the analog information..
> On Oct 18, 2021, at 10:21 AM, uǝlƃ ☤>$ wrote:
>
>
> The Diverse Meanings of Digital Sovereignty
> https://globalmedia.mit.edu/2020/08/05/the-diverse-meanings-of-digital-sovereignty/
>
> "
> 1) Cyberspace sovereignty
> 2) State Digital Sovereignty
>
The Diverse Meanings of Digital Sovereignty
https://globalmedia.mit.edu/2020/08/05/the-diverse-meanings-of-digital-sovereignty/
"
1) Cyberspace sovereignty
2) State Digital Sovereignty
3) Indigenous digital sovereignty
4) Social movements digital sovereignty
5) 'Personal' digital sovereignty
"
O
endlessly questionable
-- rec --
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:12 AM Marcus Daniels
wrote:
> Wouldn't a postmodernist say that the nouns and verbs in the argument have
> different weights and that to the extent there are canonical assignments
> for these weights, it reflects arbitrary norms and t
Wouldn't a postmodernist say that the nouns and verbs in the argument have
different weights and that to the extent there are canonical assignments for
these weights, it reflects arbitrary norms and the accumulation of power? In
this view it seems to me a contribution to point out cases where
No. Below is where Frank bent his own thread. I was addressing Frank's comment
directly. If you blow the whistle, blow it at Frank.
On October 16, 2021 10:10:20 AM PDT, Frank Wimberly wrote:
>Also on Friday you said that you are happy when people my age die. So it
>doesn't matter to you that 95
10 matches
Mail list logo
