oops... originally sent only to Marcus by mistake...
On 12/28/18 6:59 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/28/politics/maine-governor-certifies-congressional-election/index.html
*From:* Steven A Smith
*
Hi, Everybody,
I have been writing this email for most of the last week.
While I am loath to argue with Frank on matters of logic and mathematics, I
think his solution violates Peirce’s project by making our understanding of
truth dependent on our understanding of Real, rather than, as P
"Here's a link I'd like to share with Friam--very different thoughts for the
New Year. https://breakermag.com/trapped-at-sea-with-cryptos-nouveau-riche/ "
Hilarious article. Truth is I'd probably be tired of her too (and vice versa)
after the ordeal if I had been along for the trip. Not sur
Anyone know if their is a number to call to reach a human about the bad
road maintenance? My thinking is instead of getting to bent...maybe call
them to a few times to get the roads claid and salted. Surely their's a
number to call. One neibore doesn't think that'll do much good, the other's
driv
Thanks, Owen, for sharing this link. In February, through crazy
circumstances, I've been invited to Switzerland to CERN for some privileged
tours. I'm taking my 15-year old granddaughter with me so that she can
explain it all.
Here's a link I'd like to share with Friam--very different thoughts f
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 5:47 PM Nick Thompson
wrote:
> FWIW, I define it as the fundamental, unarticulated, inexplicit “picture”
> of the world that lies the way a person thinks and argues.
>
>
>
> Owen, if you had to define it, how would you? I have always sensed that
> you computer folk have a
Glen writes:
< Such wilting rhetoric makes an actual individualist like the Unabomber seem
more upstanding and trustworthy ... and that inference is just plain dangerous.
>
He gave a coherent description of this aspect of the individualist psychology
and a need for dignity above all else.
In support (that he likely doesn't want) of Marcus' constraints on the wiggle
room allowed to "individualists", I've often wondered about the VERY common
accusation of "strawman!", as a response to criticism. To put my wonder in
context, I saw this article on a very liberally biased website (Ra
Ha! In light of the g-conjecture news, you sent me on an interesting journey
trying to find out why a philosopher of science would have contributed to
simplicial complexes. The answer is Adolf ≠ Branko! 8^)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Branko_Gr%C3%BCnbaum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A
Thanks for this Glen,
To your points below:
I don’t want to sound like I am propounding some totalizing system, or even the
position that one exists, much less that I could say what it is. I am very
strongly on the side of heterarchy, and I fully concur with the arguments you
put behind the p
10 matches
Mail list logo
