Any suggestions on how to fix these two types of problems?
thanks,
Nicole
--
Nicole Senecal
Neuroscience Graduate Group
Kable Lab
3720 Walnut St., Room C37
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Lab phone: 215-746-4371
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.m
examples we will take a look. What version as you
> running? Have you checked the accuracy of the talairach.xfm?
>
> Cheers
> Bruce
>
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Nicole Senecal
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In reconstructing some normal adult MP
this boundary
correctly. As long as the surfaces are correct, and my primary interest
will be cortical thickness, do I need to worry about these inaccuracies in
the aseg? Is checking the aseg primarily done for ensuring accuracy in
subcortical structures rather than in cortex?
thanks,
Nicole
--
N
fer5-1/fsfast
FSF_OUTPUT_FORMAT nii
SUBJECTS_DIR /jet/kable/CorticalThickness/Subjects
MNI_DIR /usr/local/freesurfer5-1/mni
FSL_DIR /usr/local/fsl
thanks,
Nicole
--
Nicole Senecal
Neuroscience Graduate Group
Kable Lab
3720 Walnut St., Room C37
Philadelphia,
#x27;t follow the wm.mgz it means there was a
> topological defect that was corrected in that region. You can find it and
> fix it be editing the wm. If you can't find it, upload it and send us the
> coords you are looking at and we'll find it and show you.
>
> cheers
>
Hi all,
My lab is just starting to use Freesurfer, and are finding that a lot of
our recon-all jobs are needing a fair amount of editing. We've run into a
problem that we can't figure out how to address - on several of our brains,
a large chunk (up to 2/3 of the brain) is missing from the wm.mgz f