Hi there,
I am trying to run reg-feat2anat and having a bit of an odd problem. It runs
but doesn't produce a anat2exf.register.dat. If I look at the
anat2exf.register.dat.fslregister.log file I see right at the beginning it fail
with:
/data/results/genDIS
mri_convert ERROR: could not determine
Hi Mehul,
Thank you for sharing this. Could you include how this would compare to a GPU
AWS instance with FreeSurfer's GPU switch?
Cheers,
-Morgan
On Feb 1, 2013, at 6:54 PM, Mehul Sampat wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Just wanted to share our experience with running FS 5.2-beta on Amazon Web
> S
I will check with the Emory group that I know has been scanning canines.
Don't know if they are interested in the extra work to get FreeSurfer
output but since they are doing FMRI maybe they would be OK with sharing
their AMRI data.
It would be good to ask C. Destrieux on the progress with pig and
Hi there,
Just trying out the QAtools and I notice that there are a number of
"(standard_in) 1: syntax error" reports for each subcortical label:
checking subcortical label: Endosteum, . +/- .
(standard_in) 1: syntax error
(standard_in) 1: syntax error
(standard_in) 1: syntax error
(standard_in)
External Email - Use Caution
Hi John,
I know others (Satra?) might have more recent experience. I used to be able
to get recon-all down to about 4 hours. OpenMP made the most difference but
the GPU code always helped if you have it running. It really depends on
whether you can get
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Richard,
That is a very good point. I knew it was being deprecated and there was
talk of OpenCL but I have not been keeping up. Multicore systems were
getting the most benefit from newer releases. Certainly, to run the
existing CUDA code involved ma
I would like to make a mask for group analysis that excludes the unknown
parcellation area. Since I would like to apply the same mask to all
subjects (I have already brought them into alignment with mri_preproc),
I was wondering how I can convert the average template
label/?h.aparc.annot to a
Thanks Bruce,
Are there any other parcellation units that should be excluded? That
seems to be the only white matter PU.
Cheers,
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Morgan,
no thickness should not be used in the cc.
Bruce
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
I would like to make a mask
Bruce Fischl wrote:
which parcellation are you using?
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Thanks Bruce,
Are there any other parcellation units that should be excluded? That
seems to be the only white matter PU.
Cheers,
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Morgan,
no thickness should not be us
the vertices and x,y.z of each label, including
'unknown' and 'corpuscallosum' (which are the only two that need
excluding). Will that provide you with what you need?
Nick
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 21:35 +0100, Morgan Hough wrote:
I am using ICA on what would be input to mri_glm
Thanks Doug,
Does a mask.mgh file get written out to the glmdir?
Cheers,
-Morgan
Doug Greve wrote:
If you're using glmfit, you can --label
$SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/lh.Medial_wall.label --mask-inv
Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi Nick,
I see. I am just not sure how to put this back tog
I see this does output a mask.mgh which is just what I need. I can
convert this and have my nifti mask. Thanks again.
Doug Greve wrote:
If you're using glmfit, you can --label
$SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage/lh.Medial_wall.label --mask-inv
Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi Nick,
I see. I am jus
I have a quick question about an error we are getting with FS 3.0.5 when
we are using tkmedit as described in the tutorial to display the
segmentations overlaid on the T1.
tkmedit good_output brainmask.mgz lh.white -aux T1.mgz -aux-surface rh.white
-segmentation aseg.mgz
The first error seem
/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 16:54 +0100, Morgan Hough wrote:
I have a quick question about an error we are getting with FS 3.0.5 when
we are using tkmedit as described in the tutorial to display the
segmentations overlaid on the T1.
tkmedit good_output brainmask.mgz lh.white
Once I have defined a label in tksurfer and I select *Tools -> *Group*
-> Graph Marked Vertices Avg to open a scatterplot window, how do I
change the y axis label from the default "external" label. I assume that
I need to set this beforehand in the fsgd file but I wasn't sure how.
Thanks in adv
I was wondering if I can make a cortical label from a volume ROI from
the commandline. I would like to extract thickness values from a region
defined in each subject's volume space. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
-Morgan
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Frees
I just wanted to check which surface was used to compute area and which
reference would have this information. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
-Morgan
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listi
surface you
want. I think we also by default compute an ?h.pial.area file.
Bruce
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
I just wanted to check which surface was used to compute area and
which reference would have this information. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
-Morgan
x27;t it? I would
rather use the average of the two
Bruce
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Thanks Bruce,
These will give quite different values, right? Any chance of getting
at the mid-thickness area?
Cheers,
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Morgan,
you get to choose. I think the
Hi there,
I am trying to interpolate a volume of tstats to the average surface
with mri_vol2surf but I am getting the error below. Does mri_vol2surf
take all the inputs that mri_convert takes? Is this a float2int problem
mentioned in the bugs section of the --help? If the latter, what
argumen
.mgz file using
mri_convert? The error message looks like it can't interpret the file
as a NIFTI file (the preceeding float2int message being misleading in
this instance, I think).
Nick
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 23:27 +0100, Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi there,
I am trying to interpolate a volume o
tween them or take the max. This type of comparison is always a bit
ill-posed because the surface in a 3d talairach imbedding space is not
that meaningful. You might try mapping your surface-based results into
the talairach volume.
doug
Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi Doug,
Multiple versions ar
Hi there,
I would like to ask some questions about metric distortion.
1. Following the Wisco et al (2007) paper, metric distortion is defined as
Metric Distortion = k * area of a triangle on a registered sphere / area
of triangle on gray/white interface surface
which I believe I can compute
n Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi there,
I would like to ask some questions about metric distortion.
1. Following the Wisco et al (2007) paper, metric distortion is
defined as
Metric Distortion = k * area of a triangle on a registered sphere /
area of triangle on gray/white inte
put a new
(linux) version here:
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/mri_cor2label
See the help.
I don't know why mri_mergelabels does not work. Is it possible that
the tail command is platform dependent?
doug
Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I have
ote:
Sorry, should be accessible now. To do what you need, you can just run
mri_binarize on the output (or input) of vol2surf. I've put an
uptodate copy of mri_binarize there too.
doug
Morgan Hough wrote:
Thanks Doug,
I am having some trouble downloading this but the tksurfer interface
s
Hi Doug,
I see what you mean now. mri_cor2label should do it. Thanks again.
Cheers,
-Morgan
Doug Greve wrote:
No, use mri_cor2label to create the label file. I think the 2nd
example matches what you want to do.
doug
Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thanks for the ftp fix. I have downloaded
Hi there,
Hopefully a quick question. I was wondering what the del represents in
the mri_vol2surf option --projfrac-avg?
--projfrac-avg min max del
If I use 0 and 1 for min and max, what should del be to average across
all the voxels between the two surfaces? Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
-M
is to average along the normal.
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi there,
Hopefully a quick question. I was wondering what the del represents
in the mri_vol2surf option --projfrac-avg?
--projfrac-avg min max del
If I use 0 and 1 for min and max, what should del be to average
acros
Would it be possible to post binaries of mris_wm_volume again? I believe
this is the preferred tool to calculate the total white matter volume
over the current aseg output. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
-Morgan
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nm
:
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/fsdev/nicks/dev
Nick
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 17:56 +0100, Morgan Hough wrote:
Would it be possible to post binaries of mris_wm_volume again? I believe
this is the preferred tool to calculate the total white matter volume
over the current aseg output. T
Hi Bruce,
I am afraid the zero is all the output I get. Do I need an updated
mris_volume as well perhaps?
Cheers,
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
that looks like the correct usage. Can you send the entire screen output?
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks for the tool
Hi Bruce,
Our subjects don't have this label (?h.cortex) in their label
directories. Was this introduced with a recent version? What is the best
approximation of this cortical gray matter volume measure for people who
have older recons?
Cheers,
-Morgan
Hi Mike,
you need to exclude non-co
I have a question about using labels from different annots. The Desikan
annot has a large region labeled unknown including medial wall and
lateral insula and operculum. The Destrieux annot has a separate medial
wall label. Is there an easy way to use the Destrieux annot label of the
medial wall
NMR at /autofs/homes/010/morgan/con_2878.
Cheers,
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
works for me. Can you drop the subjects on our site?
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I am afraid the zero is all the output I get. Do I need an updated
mris_volume as well perhaps?
Cheers
I was wondering if I can use the surface area estimate of the aparc
corpus callosum label as a decent subject specific measurement of its
cross-sectional area. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
-Morgan
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.
, Morgan Hough wrote:
I was wondering if I can use the surface area estimate of the aparc
corpus callosum label as a decent subject specific measurement of its
cross-sectional area. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
-Morgan
___
Freesurfer mailing list
emi
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Morning Bruce,
I just checked this on a subject you already have there. I get the
same result at NMR with this subject using the dev version of
mris_wm_volume from /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/bin/mris_wm_volume
which I think is the best match for the
Hi Bruce,
That did it. Great. The output is mm^3? Thanks again.
Cheers,
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
oops, there should only be one --in_center on the cmd line (followed
by 0 0 0 )
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I try this in $subject/mri but I get the following
I would like to obtain a ratio of gyral/sulcal GM/WM boundary surface
area. I was wondering if the best solution would be to threshold each
subject's ?h.sulc files to form a label that contains all gyral areas
and then use mris_anatomical_stats -l to constrain a surface area
measurement to this
om the old
recon-all output?
Cheers,
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Morgan,
yes, that seems reasonable. You can start with the ?h.cortex.label and
subdivide it into sulcal and gyral to avoid the medial wall.
cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
I would like to obtain a rati
mris_make_surfaces and it will create them (and not deform the
surface in regions outside the label)
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi Bruce,
These subjects were run with an older version of FreeSurfer and don't
have ?h.cortex.label. I am afraid I don't see a generating comma
Hi ,
I would like to use mri_segstats with an aprac parcellation to get the
mean/stddev of the norm.mgz intensities by parcel. I have tried the
following usage:
mri_segstats --annot con_2304 lh aparc --ctab-default --nonempty
--excludeid 0 --sum con_2304.norm.aseg.sum --in
$SUBJECTS_DIR/con
I was just wondering why the banks of the superior temporal sulcus was
made into its own label on the Desikan template. Does this correspond
(roughly) to a particular functional area. I didn't see anything in the
paper about why it was chosen. Is it just easy to define given
sulcal/gyral bounda
l AD.
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
I was just wondering why the banks of the superior temporal sulcus
was made into its own label on the Desikan template. Does this
correspond (roughly) to a particular functional area. I didn't see
anything in the paper about why it was chosen.
I am reporting thickness values from subjects native space constrained
by mask labels using mris_anatomical_stats. I am currently getting the
average of the unsmoothed estimates. I would like to be able to get
smoothed values but the usage reports the smoothing option as -nsmooth
<#> where the
Hi there,
I just wanted to check on the spatial resolution limits of FS4. Is it
possible to process a whole-brain, 0.5mm isotropic voxel size volume
without downsampling it? Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
-Morgan
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@
Hi there,
I was wondering if sulcal CSF differences should be reported given the
difficulty in its identification from T1 data? How is sulcal CSF defined
by FS? Thanks in advance for your time.
Cheers,
-Morgan
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer
I downloaded the latest freesurfer-dev and I was testing out my install
with "recon-all -autorecon-all -subjid bert" and I am getting this
error.
mri_convert nu4.mnc nu.mgz
mincRead(): can't find
file /var/scratch11/mhough/subjects/bert/mri/nu4.mnc
reading from nu4.mnc...
ERROR: converting nu to C
49 matches
Mail list logo