Hi,
I am planning on looking at a specific region of interest, and I am wondering
it is possible to only "quality check" this region and leave the rest of the
brain as is.
Meaning, can I save the time of going through every slice and re-assigning
voxels for the entire brain and just focus on m
: Kairys, Anson
Cc: 'freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu'
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Using an ROI and not correcting/"fixing" the rest of
the image
Hi Anson
yes, that's ok as long as you make sure that the registration
(sphere.reg) is ok for group results.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu,
Hi everyone,
I am attempting to create and ROI and look at cortical thickness only within
this region (ignoring results outside this region in hopes of saving some time
going through and re-assiging voxels with poor segmentation).
Question:
How should I create the ROI (typically I would use MA
Hi Everyone,
I would like to "import" an ROI into a FS analysis and extract thickness
measures form within this region. Is this at all possible?
Thanks
Anson K,
**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be
I got an error beginning with this.
Thanks for any help
Error in analyze: command failed: mri_glmfit --y
//qdec/LH_insula_thick/y.mgh --fsgd
**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be
used for urgent or
Hi everyone,
I got the error I just mentioned. Terminal window says "no contrasts specified".
I am trying to use "timepoint" (1-4) as a discrete factor to look at thickness
across time. I guess I will have to resort to longitudinal processing?
Thanks for the help
-Anson
***
Hi,
In the longitudinal tutorial it states that: "In order to analyze your
longitudinal data, you have different options. You could, e.g., open the stats
text files in each tpN.long.templateID/stats/ dir, containing statistics such
as volume of subcortical structures or thickness averages for c
Hello FS experts,
I am running a group up subjects pre/post treatment.
When trying to do group analysis, after converting data with the mri_slope
command, when I made the long table into a cross table, I noticed in qdec it
averaged my "time" variable and only supplies a mean and there is no lon
treatment.
Best
Anson K.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Reuter [mailto:mreu...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 5:51 PM
To: Kairys, Anson
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal analysis question
Hi Anson,
Qdec can only do cross sectional
ssage-
From: Martin Reuter [mailto:mreu...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 9:39 AM
To: Kairys, Anson; 'Martin Reuter'
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal analysis question
Hi Anson
Yes, mixed effects models is the better option. I
10 matches
Mail list logo