on-all.log is attached.
Please advise,
Thank you,
-Eric Cunningham
recon-all.log
Description: Binary data
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this
on-all.log is attached.
Please advise,
Thank you,
-Eric Cunningham
recon-all.log
Description: Binary data
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this
Hello Freesurfer Experts,
Our group is trying to determine the importance of manual edits on our
data. After discovering poor white matter segmentation in the
supramarginal/inferiorparietal regions, we performed manual edits as
described in the FsTutorial.
Surprisingly, the areas we edited had r
Hello Freesurfer Experts,
I am currently trying to run the Linear Mixed Effects Models described in
the wiki here:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LinearMixedEffectsModels
And I am running into difficulties that are fairly well described by the
last message in this previous mail thread:
Hello Freesurfer experts,
I have a question about how to determine if a covariate is important in a
mixed effects model
for example:
Y1 = B1 + B2(time) + B3(rand_effect1) + B4(rand_effect*time) +
B5(covariate_1) +B6(covariate_2)
Y2 = B1 + B2(time) + B3(rand_effect1) + B4(rand_effect*time) +
B5(cov
(covariate_1)
The difference between the two that I was trying to highlight is the
presence of the second covariate term.
Thanks,
-E
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Eric Cunningham wrote:
> Hello Freesurfer experts,
> I have a question about how to determine if a covariate is important in a
&
Hello Freesurfer experts,
The lme_mass_vw script runs for a long time and outputs info into the
matlab terminal. Most look like this:
Location #: Algorithm did not converge. Initial and final likelihoods:
###, ###
Running this script, for almost every line, the initial and final
likelihood
Hello Freesurfer experts,
I am getting some unusual results with the lme pipeline, and I would
appreciate help with identifying the most likely step in which the problem
may have originated.
Running lme_fit_FS.m on a single vertex, followed by lme_F on the output of
that (stats) yields a p-value
Hello Freesurfer Experts,
I am trying to reproduce the values in sig.mgh using matlab, just to
confirm that I know what is going on. My numbers do not match exactly, and
I am hoping someone can explain my error, or point me in the right
direction.
With Qdec, I built a model with one discrete fac
Greetings Freesurfer experts,
The README file in the $SUBJECTS_DIR says that a different directory can be
specified by setting the env var SUBJECTS_DIR prior to the 'source
$FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferEnv.csh' statement.
Do the original contents of SUBJECTS_DIR (such as fsaverage) need to be
moved
Other than fsaverage, are there any other files that need to be linked for
recon-all to work?
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> Hi Eric
> No, you can just symlink fsaverage and such
> Cheers
> Bruce
>
> > On Nov 23, 2015, at 9:40 PM, E
Hi,
I have a few very basic clarification questions regarding the recon-all
processing pipeline.
I am currently following the instructions here:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/Talairach
Near the end of the page, it instructs me to rerun the whole process using
my new talairach
, but
most seem like they could be made better by a tweak here or there. At what
point would I just be adding randomness by manually editing?
About what percent of a given dataset would you expect to manually edit?
Much appreciated,
-Eric Cunningham
Hi Bruce,
I am running version 5.10
Thanks,
-Eric
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Eric
>
> what version are you running?
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Eric Cunningham wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>>
>> I am trying to determine how bad a
fically has a problem with Talairach accuracy (is that
> right Nick?). Should be much better with the next release
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Eric Cunningham wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>> I am running version 5.10
>> Thanks,
>> -Eric
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 20
Would you recommend subjects through autorecon1 in freesurfer 5.0 and then
through autorecon2 and autorecon3 in 5.1?
Thanks,
-Eric
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Eric Cunningham wrote:
> Hi all,
> Ah, good to know that there is a Talairach accuracy problem. What have
> other gr
Hi folks,
In previous threads, the command provided to check the talairach.lta is...
tkregister2 --mov $FREESURFER_HOME/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca \
--targ ../brainmask.mgz --lta-inv talairach.lta --reg
talairach.lta.reg.dat \ --surfs --s $subject
When I try to run this command, I run into t
0/tktools/ (after making a copy of the one there).
> doug
>
>
>
>
> On 11/5/12 5:00 PM, Eric Cunningham wrote:
>
> [e4fs@cluster bin]$ ls -l `which tkregister2.bin`
> -rwxr-xr-- 1 jsadinol fs 21663433 May 22 2011 /apps/fs510/tktools/
> tkregister2.bin
>
&g
Hi,
this link:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/TalFailV5.1
discusses a solution to bad talairach.xfm transforms, the -use-mritotal
flag.
this link:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/eTIV
mentions that the talairach.xfm is used to calculate the total intracranial
volume.
is using
intensities look like gray matter, but it could be damaged white matter
> instead.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Eric Cunningham wrote:
>
> hello freesurfer experts,
>>
>> attached is an image drawn from the tutorial page.
&
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer Experts,
I have recently processed some data with the following 2 steps:
1) Perform skullstripping outside freesurfer to generate a nifti file
(mostly using AFNI).
2) Run that through freesurfer using the -noskullstrip flag.
Comparing
External Email - Use Caution
Hello Freesurfer Experts,
I am trying to plot the ${meas} values at the maximum vertex in a
significant cluster found by the group analysis pipeline (mri_glmfit).
I created an .mgh file with mris_preproc, rh.cbd7.area.10.mgh. I read this
file into ma
,
-Eric
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:42 AM Douglas N. Greve
wrote:
> Do you have a 1-off error? Ie, FS starts counting at 0 and matlab starts
> counting at 1. So vertex 53263 is vertex 53264 in matlab.
>
> On 8/12/2020 5:31 PM, Eric Cunningham wrote:
>
> External Email - U
gender), would I be able to define that as a numeric variable with
> values 0 and 1, rather than splitting up my other categories?
>
> Thank you for your help,
> -Eric
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:42 AM Douglas N. Greve
> wrote:
>
>> Do you have a 1-off erro
24 matches
Mail list logo