Hello Freesurfer experts,
I have got some problems with qdec. For testing my data i make an design with
age, sexe and right and left hippocampus. The same design as the tutorial on
the freesurfer wiki. When starting anlalyze i get an Error in Analyze: command
failed: mri_concat
/data1/project
Hi Doug,
I run the mri_concat command with 9 subjects in the command line. for the LH
thickness and volume. A segmentation fault is the problem.
What do i have to do in this case?
Many thanks,
Stan
freesurfer-Linux-centos5_x86_64-dev-20110315
SUBJECTS_DIR /data1/proje
Hi Freesurfer Experts,
In my design i want to use a general linear model tot relate cognitive
performance and cortical thickness. I want to control for age, total gray
matter, gender and education. I have two discrete variables, including gender
(0,1) and Education (1-7). The problem is that
Hi Freesurfer Experts,
Just to make it sure i have a question about correcting for cranial size.
I compared two groups, 100 patients versus 50 Controls. I entered a discrete
variable 'groups' (Patients: 1 and controls:2) in qdec. For cortical thickness
difference between these groups, do i
each cluster. This is a
simple text file.
On 01/14/2013 09:08 AM, Berg, S.F. van den wrote:
>
> Dear Freesurfer Experts,
>
> I would like the mean thickness measures of each cluster i found in qdec.
>
> I used qdec for a group comparison in cortical thickness between a
> patient
Dear Freesurfer experts,
We investigated the relation between cortical thickness and performance on
several cognitive tasks within a large group of Parkinson’s disease patients,
but are slightly puzzled by the results. We obtained several, both in the
vertex-wise analysis in qdec and in the
_
From: Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: 05 February 2013 15:54
To: Berg, S.F. van den
Cc: Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Difficult results from our PD data
Hi Stan
we have found positive correlations between performance (in this case
CVLT) and thickness
