External Email - Use Caution
Hello all,
I want to assess the skull stripping quality performed in Freesurfer
(autorecon1) and in FSL. Does any program enable to evaluate the skull
stripping quality? If so, which metric is used for an evaluation?
___
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Doug,
We thought it would be better to use 5th order icosahedron tesselation for
PET because the resolution of the volume is lower: If, for thickness
analysis, we carry the structural volumes with a resolution of 1x1x1 to
ico7 on the surface, with P
External Email - Use Caution
Dear FS experts, Hi!I have a very basic question about GLM model in FS-FAST.After GLM analysis, there is a beta.nii under the analysis/ directory and a ces.nii under each contrast/ directory. In the tutorial, beta.nii is the regression coef
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I’ve just completed a GLM analysis in Freesurfer and I’d like to be sure that
all the steps I’ve performed are the right ones.
My analysis is looking at age related changes in cortical thickness in one
group of patients, aft
Hi Adam
the most common metric would involve doing a manual stripping, usually of
a T2. Note that in FS we designed it using a risk-minimization approach
that weighs removing brain as much more costly (~10x I think) then leaving
around skull.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Adam Rytina wr
External Email - Use Caution
Dear FreeSurfer Community,
I have used the CVS and BBR registration methods to spatially align T1 and
diffusion images to an ideal subject’s T1. I have noticed some discrepancies
when viewing the aligned images in FSLview. If I toggle between subjec