Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I am trying to obtain partial volume fractions of a DTI volume.
When using the PETsurf framework (mri_gtmpvc), I obtain a pvf.nii.gz volume
with GM, WM, subcortical, CSF and Skull tissue % values. However, when
running the mri_compute_volume_fraction, the output diffears.
Hi Michelle,
it should work like this. I don't know if it was tested with the -3T and
-mprage flags. You can try to omit these flags (for testing only).
Also the SB017 has been processed cross sectionally before, right?
For debugging, you can also look at the individual steps in the base
pro
Hi list,
aftermri_label2label --srcsubject Subj01 --srclabel ROI.label --trgsubject
Subj01 --trglabel Subj01/label/ROI.label --hemi lh --regmethod
surfaceandmris_anatomical_stats -l Subj01/label/ROI.label -b Subj01
I have run
mris_anatomical_stats -l Subj01/ROI_neg.label -b Subj01 lh
the follow
Dear FS experts,
Are there any tools in freesurfer for 3D visualization (e.g. glass brain)? Any
recommendations are appreciated
Thanks
John___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesu
Hi Lorenzo,
I was trying to do this too, and used:
1. mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage --trgsubject $s --hemi $h
--sval-annot $h.yeo.annot
--tval $SUBJECTS_DIR/$s/label/$h.yeo.annot
2. make yeo.gtmseg.ctab - I copied gtmseg.ctab, pasted yeo net
Hello Doug,
Thank you very much for the response. Any reason why I have a list of
clusters when none of them were significant (based on the CWP). I thought
clusters that appeared on the summary text file should always be
significant because they survived correction.
Best,
Paul
On Mon, Sep 25, 20
