Hei
Er det id 2 og 3 du har problemer med? Det ser ut som at du ikke har kjørt
bedpostx på disse to idene og jeg ser at du ikke har kjørt trac-all -prep
utifra logfilen
.
[/work/projects/nn9208k/subjects/LMR/dtitracula/2]: ls
dlabel dmri dpath scripts
[/work/projects/nn9208k/subjects/LMR/dti
Hello experts.
I have some question to you.
I used SurfStat statistical tool to analyze the two group(control, patient)
When i click the surf in fsaverage folder and then show up lh.pial and
lh.pial_avg.
What is the differences between lh.pial and lh.pial_avg ?
lh.pial_avg means that real subj
Hello,
I too am having trouble with tksurfer displaying the surfaces upside down
and back to front, but believing that they are correctly oriented (i.e.
Talairach coordinates change in the wrong direction wrt to the surface but
in the correct direction wrt the display window). I"m also running a C
No, no PHI gets transferred into the mgz file.
On 9/29/16 1:08 AM, prasser wrote:
Hi,
When using mri_convert to create 001.mgz from dicom that have *not*
been anonymized does any patient, institution, study description etc
information get transferred into the 001.mgz?
Thanks.
_
Hi,
Many thanks for your prompt reply Pr. Greve.
I did :
mri_glmfit --y
/home/damien/bin/freesurfer/subjects/qdec/RH_Dys-CT_CSA_AgeGenderWRCSA/y.mgh
--fsgd
/home/damien/bin/freesurfer/subjects/qdec/RH_Dys-CT_CSA_AgeGenderWRCSA/qdec.fsgd
dods --glmdir
/home/damien/bin/freesurfer/subjects/qde
Hello FreeSurfer experts,
I am considering using Freesurfer recon-all for segmentation of T1 brain
MRIs of young subjects (1-4 years). I am planning to use a Freesurfer
compliant pediatric template to maximize the segmentation accuracy.
In the publication titled *A FreeSurfer-compliant consistent
Hi Paige
we have stopped development and most support of tksurfer. Can you use
freeview instead or is there still some functionality that you need that
is unique to tksurfer?
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Paige Scalf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I too am having trouble with tksurfer displaying the
I want to project to the native subject surfaces though, not fsaverage. If I
use —trgsubject subjID would that work with the —icoorder flag? Alternatively
I guess I could project to fsaverage and then use mri_surf2surf to move back to
the subject surface, but that seems like a roundabout way t
Hi Jared
the icosahedra are only used to represent average space surface
(fsaverage[4-7]), not individual subjects.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Jared P
Zimmerman wrote:
I want to project to the native subject surfaces though, not fsaverage. If
I use —trgsubject subjID would that wor
Ahh, thanks Bruce. Is there a way to downsample the subject meshes?
-jared
> On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
>
> Hi Jared
>
> the icosahedra are only used to represent average space surface
> (fsaverage[4-7]), not individual subjects.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Thu, 29 Sep 20
Dear all,
I am trying to perform a longitudinal statistic by using the LME mass
univariate toolbox. I have two groups of subjects (each acquired 3 or 4 times
over the follow-up), and I want to test whether atrophy progresses differently
over time in these two groups.
I followed the tutorial on
Hi,
I am a new user and trying to install Freesurfer using the virtualbox
installation instructions (windows 7). I have
created the virtual machine and can view the VB manager with the correct
specific (general, system, display, etc) using the freesurfer image
(freesurfer*.vdi). The FreeSur
Dear Freesurfer's experts,
Could you answer me about my last question with no response in the mail
below ?
When using cortical thickness in longitudinal analysis with LME, we used
lh.thickness or rh.thickness from -long subject directories. These data
followed particular processing steps includin
Dear Freesurfer's experts,
I would like to register PET image onto T1 anatomical. I used bbregister
with the following command and it failed :
*bbregister --s SUBJID --init-fsl --t2 --mov PET.nii.gz --reg
Pet2T1.register.dof6.dat --lta Pet2T1.register.dof6.lta --init-reg-out
Pet2T1.init.register.
Another bump.
On 09/21/2016 04:18 PM, Joel Bruss wrote:
> I have two subjects, subA and subB. subA has a binary ROI mask, native
> space, that I'd like to place in subB's native space. Both subjects have
> been run through all stages of recon, edited, etc. Is there a better or
> easier way to ac
I'll cc the list, which I should have done the first time. No, you
didn't do anything wrong. This is what mri_label2label should do - sample
these locations onto the surface you specify and fill in the vertex
indices. Check the output of label2label and see if it has values >= 0
cheers
Bruce
On
The way you have it configured now, this is a volume-based ROI, so you
need to use the volume-based reg method. This will map between the two
subjects using the affine (12 dof) talairach registration which will not
be as accurate as the surface-based registration. If this is a cortical
ROI, I c
I don't understand what you mean. When you use ico (when it used to
work), it always went to fsaverage space. Do you want to decimate the
native space surfaces?
On 09/29/2016 10:15 AM, Jared P Zimmerman wrote:
> I want to project to the native subject surfaces though, not
> fsaverage. If I us
sorry, not sure I understand. Are you coding a catagorical variable as a
continuous covariate? What tutorial are you referring to?
On 09/29/2016 10:39 AM, Valsasina Paola wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to perform a longitudinal statistic by using the LME mass
> univariate toolbox. I have
This is the output on label2label. The first colum of the created column is -1.
mri_label2label --srcsubject segfs --srclabel
/mnt/netScratch/crawforda/BrainStem/study11074/S2sdt/segfs/label/Testing1.label
--trgsubject segfs --trglabel Testing1N.label --regmethod volume
srclabel =
/mnt/netScra
1) Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to do
2) Depends on what you are testing. If you are looking at the slopes of
the covariates, then demeaning is not important. If you are looking at
group differences, you should first look for a difference in the slopes.
If there is no significa
That is a volume-based label. Try using the --paint option to
mri_label2label to convert it to a surface-based label (assuming it is
actually on the surface). Run mri_label2label with --help to get an example
On 09/29/2016 12:38 PM, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> This is the output on label2label. The
I added the --paint option which seemed to run successfully. I loaded it as a
label on the inflated surface and it did not crash, but I do not see it
anywhere on the surface. Does this just mean that I didn't actually draw it on
the surface? As in, everything was done correct, the location of th
Sounds like it. View the label on the volume while displaying the
surfaces in the volume and see if they intersect
On 09/29/2016 01:12 PM, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> I added the --paint option which seemed to run successfully. I loaded it as a
> label on the inflated surface and it did not crash,
you can also look at the vertex index of the first entry in the label
file and type that into the "cursor" field in freeview so it will go to
that point. My guess is that it does intersect the surface, otherwise the
label indices would have stayed -1
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Douglas N Greve wrote:
It seems as though I did something else wrong. I am guessing it has to do with
dmax (I used inflated as my surface) for the --paint option. I had tried 0,1,
and dmax as the input to the option. The new label it created only had 1 entry
of all zeros which is why I cannot find it on the surface or
oh, don't use inflated! The sampling uses the surface to look up the
location for the sampling. Use white most likely. The vertex index will
allow you to see if on the inflated surface without doing anything else
cheers
Bruce
On
Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> It seems as though I di
I looked at some structures and the absolute differences range from 8-35
mm^3. They are quite small but I was surprised to see any difference since
they are the same scan.
Thanks,
Tamara
Hi Tamara
can you let us know how big the differences are?
thanks
Bruce
On Wed, 28 Sep 2016,
Douglas Greve
i used dmax white. I now can see it on the inflated surface. Thank you for all
your help in getting this working. Sorry, it took so long since I'm trying to
figure all of this out still. The next step will be to take a volume that
already has a selected region defined and projecting that region
Ah, I see. The ROI will be subject-dependent (I want to do this for
multiple subjects) but the majority, if not all, should be cortical.
Any help you'd be willing to provide would be much appreciated.
On 09/29/2016 11:31 AM, Douglas N Greve wrote:
> The way you have it configured now, this is a
glad it worked out
Bruce
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, Crawford, Anna wrote:
> i used dmax white. I now can see it on the inflated surface. Thank you for
> all your help in getting this working. Sorry, it took so long since I'm
> trying to figure all of this out still. The next step will be to take a
>
Hello FS experts,
I have a data set of 20 subjects (patients) collected at location-1 with 3T
Siemens scanner. Also, I have a set of age-matched 20 subjects (controls)
collected at location-2 with 3T Siemens scanner.
I am interested in comparing cortical thickness between controls and
patients us
Hi,
Even if the two sites are the same Siemens model, you are going to have difficultly convincing people that any differences you find might not just be a site effect. In my opinion, this falls into the “not possible at all” category.
cheers,
-MH
--
Michael Harms, Ph
Hi there,
As a complete newbie to the Tracula tool, I have a questions about using
it. Is it possible to train tracula to track additional pathways other than
the 18 thats are already included? I was to track several pathways that are
not included with Tracula.
Best,
Kris
___
Yeah, I think I misunderstood what was happening with the ico registration. I
thought it was using the ico to downsample the subject surface, but I see that
this is an atlas space and I can do w/e calculations I need I this space and
then register back to subject space after.
Thanks for the h
Hi, Reposting. Thanks.
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:53:21 -0700 prasser wrote
Hi,
I'm looking to please get some help with -lgi.
I'm using matlab R2015b and FS5.3 with
recon-all -s subj_id -lgi
on os x 10.11.
Looking at the output, the first error occurs about here:
36 matches
Mail list logo