Dear Freesurfer,
The data that I'm using as a part of my study contains only the patients'
T1 images and we have not collected any control subjects yet. I want to
compare the cortical thickness of these subjects with a template (instead
of a control subject), but I'm confused which volume I need t
Hi Mahtab
we do all the analysis in native space and don't transform the data to a
template (although we do compute mappings to various templates).
As for your other question, there are too many variables to control for
(age, gender, scanner type, sequence) for us to distribute a normative
d
Dear Bruce,
Thank you for your response.
So would you please guide me how I should register the image into MNI152
coordination?
And is the cvs_avg35_inMNI152, the MNI152 template?
Best Regards,
Mahtab.
On 3 June 2016 at 13:48, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Mahtab
>
> we do all the analysis in nati
Hello !
I work for the department of radiology, Emory University.
We're planning to use the FreeSurfer software suite (or more precisely,
the surface-based stream ) in a project that aims to compare cortical
thickness between treatment and nontreatment patients.
We have finished recon-all for al
why do you need rebuilt fsaverage?
On 06/03/2016 05:06 PM, shi yao wang wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I work for the department of radiology, Emory University.
>
> We're planning to use the FreeSurfer software suite (or more precisely,
> the surface-based stream ) in a project that aims to compare cortical
Bruce,
The lh.inflated.nofix shows the brainstem and cerebellum are attached to the
cortical surface. Also, the ventricles are not filled in the filled.mgz. Could
you please tell me how to fix this manually?
Thanks,
Jaiashre.
___
Freesurfer mailing li
Hi Lawrence
you can you the
make_average_subject
script, but as Doug implies you probably don't need to. Our warp is
high-enough dimensional that you rarely need to build average subjects from
your own population
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, shi yao wang wrote:
>
> Hello !
>
> I work
hmmm, that suggests that the aseg failed badly. What does it look like?
cheers
Bruce
On
Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Jaiashre Sridhar wrote:
Bruce,
The lh.inflated.nofix shows the brainstem and cerebellum are attached to the
cortical surface. Also, the ventricles are not filled in the filled.mgz.
Could
Bruce,
The aseg looks fine to me. Is there anything in specific that I should be
looking for in aseg?
Thanks,
Jaiashre.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The inform
does it segment the cerebellum ok? If so, it should be removed during
recon-all
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Jaiashre Sridhar wrote:
Bruce,
The aseg looks fine to me. Is there anything in specific that I should be
looking for in aseg?
Thanks,
Jaiashre.
__
Dear freesurfer experts,
This is a follow up question from a previous post
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg47480.html
I have created a sig.mgh from my own stats code and need to also generate
fwhm.dat file to run the monte carlo sim, which is estimated from the
Dear freesurfer experts,I have a subject ending up with this error after
recon-all.I tried to edit the aseg and run it, but it stuck at topological step.
CORRECTING DEFECT 79 (vertices=54196, convex hull=8490)
error in the retessellation
normal vector of length zero at vertex 97187 with 0 faces
v
It is the error in the model fit. If you run mri_glmfit with --save-eres
it will save a file called eres.mgh. this is the residual file
On 6/3/16 6:29 PM, Chung, Yoonho wrote:
Dear freesurfer experts,
This is a follow up question from a previous post
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@
Hmmm, that sounds like a bug. If you upload the subject we will take a look
Cheers
Bruce
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 6:54 PM, maryam koochaki wrote:
>
> Dear freesurfer experts,
> I have a subject ending up with this error after recon-all.
> I tried to edit the aseg and run it, but it stuck at topologi
Hi Bruce,I already uploaded it.File name: test_emc_039.tar.gz
Thanks,Maryam
Regards,Maryam Kouchakidivkolaei
On Friday, June 3, 2016 9:35 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
Hmmm, that sounds like a bug. If you upload the subject we will take a
lookCheersBruce
On Jun 3, 2016, at 6:54 PM, m
Hello!
I have a fsl label (from the JHU atlas) and want to overlay this on my T1 from
FreeSurfer (native space) to create models in 3DSlicer.
What is the best way to get these labels (one ROI with intensity 1 in a nifti)
to fit the individual T1.
I tried the following:
Flirt -in MNI15_T1_1mm.ni
Hi,
I decided I should standardize my fMRI data across sessions by rescaling
each voxel to have a run-mean of 100. Normalized data looked okay under
manual inspection in FreeView. When I tried to analyze this data, however,
I consistently get an error partway through:
"""
Index exceeds matrix dim
17 matches
Mail list logo