Dear FS experts,
There is already a post about that but the concerned person never answered so
there is no solution.
I’m currently running per-vertex analyses with the --pvr flag of mri_glmfit
command. I did correlations between 2 vertex-wise variables correcting for age.
I also would like to
Hi Freesurfer Experts,
I have used freesurfer smoothed images (lh.thickness.fsaverage.fwhm15.gii)
to perform a cortical thickness analysis. I used qdec with a surface-based
morphometric analysis to compare two groups. As my discrete fixed factor I
used group membership. As Nuisance factors I used
Hi,
I followed the advice, and the White Matter surface looks much better;
however, now the pial surface is crossing the white matter surface.
I ran the following:
/usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/bin/recon-all
-subjid nmr01002 -autorecon2-wm -autorecon3 -openmp 8
for those at Martinos the new
That looks very similar in principle to something I posted back in Oct.
2014 (“pial surface crossing white”).
I think some of the subsequent back-and-forth with Bruce and Nick was off
the list, so I’ve included the key email (where Bruce diagnosed the
problem) below.
Has this been fixed in the f
Dear Maximilià,
first of all, sorry for the late response.
We assume throughout the code that mv a.ext b.ext will overwrite b.ext if it
exists. If this is not the case in your system, maybe you could create an alias
from 'mv' -> 'mv -f' before calling recon-all?
Cheers,
/Eugenio
Juan Eugenio Ig
Hi Daniel
I'm out if town , can you remind me next week? This is fixed in v6 I think if
you want to just run the pial stuff in it
Bruce
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 10:41 AM, dgw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I followed the advice, and the White Matter surface looks much better;
> however, now the pial surfac
Hello,
I am working on measuring cortical thickness of a patient group. I am using
Ubuntu 14.04
Somehow, if I use command line to perform the analysis, Freesurfer/qdec is
working fine but if I use Qdec interface, it works fine initially but when
I switch to display window, it doesn't allow me to
Hi Martina,
so you don't have a baseline (no treatment) measurement? If you have a
treatment at T0, you mean during an interval before T0, right? But since
you did not scan before that treatment, you cannot quantify that change?
The design is not clear to me.
About the random effect (with on
Hi Angela,
to get the fs_write_Y to work, you would first need to set
mri.volsz(4) = 1
(to tell it to write only a single frame).
But for writing significance maps, you can use fs_write_fstats (as you did).
Usually you don't describe the data, but simply capture the overlay of
the p values on
Hi Mike
yes, I think it is fixed. Daniel: can you try out dev and see if it fixes
this for you?
Bruce
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Harms, Michael wrote:
That looks very similar in principle to something I posted back in Oct.
2014 (“pial surface crossing white”).
I think some of the subsequent ba
Hi,
I solved it (with help from a colleague) by just calling the
individual mri_make_surfaces command separately (adjusting the
nowhite), and
the subsequent ones through the flair pial command. I am now running
-make all, to finish the rest (note it did miss one step in the
re-start: it didn't re-
yes, I think that's what V6 does I think
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, dgw wrote:
Hi,
I solved it (with help from a colleague) by just calling the
individual mri_make_surfaces command separately (adjusting the
nowhite), and
the subsequent ones through the flair pial command. I am now running
-make all,
Hi Martin
Thank you very much for your response! To clarify the design: There are 44
subjects, all have been scanned twice and thus have repeated measures of
cortical thickness. 22 subjects were first (T0) scanned 2 hours after a placebo
treatment. Some days later, the identical subjects were
Thanks,
what I mean is in order to quantify a treatment effect for the subjects
that received treatment at T0, you would need another scan before that
(Tminus1). You would need three time points:
group1: baseline, placebo, treatment
group2: baseline, treatment, placebo
you could then test if
thank you!
Martin Reuter ha scritto:
> Hi Angela,
>
> to get the fs_write_Y to work, you would first need to set
> mri.volsz(4) = 1
> (to tell it to write only a single frame).
>
> But for writing significance maps, you can use fs_write_fstats (as you did).
>
> Usually you don't describe the d
15 matches
Mail list logo