Hello FS experts,I am reposting as a good few emails went by after me posting.
My question is below.Thank you for your help.Pablo
From: pablon...@hotmail.com
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:53:21 +
Subject: [Freesurfer] repeated measures ANOVA using the FSGD file
Dear Freesurfer group,
When looking through the log after running recon-all, i have noticed two
different errors in the logs. The one being about 'volumes differ in
acquisition parameters' and the other 'Image geometries differ across time,
maybe due to aquisition changes?'.
*Volumes differ i
Dear Freesurfer group,
- I have noticed different ways of writing the 'recon-all' commands (see
below). What is the difference between these two ways of writing the
command? Or is it the same?
- recon-all -all -s -i path_to_tpN_dcm
- recon-all -i -subjid -all
- Does i
Hi Kasper
what was your input volume? The .02sec change in TR won't mean anything,
although it is a bit surprising to see, as is the fact that the other
parameters (flip angle, TE, etc...) don't seem to be preserved. We usually
read those right out of the dicom files if that is what you used as
Hi All,
I have 7T high resolution data 0.625mm. Is it appropriate to process the data
using recon-all ? If not, any idea?
Thanks!
Yun Wang
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/
Hi Yun
you should probably get a beta version of 6.0 - it has much improved
highres support. 7T can be hard though. Kyoko Fujimoto (ccd) put together a
pipeline for 7T that worked pretty well. You might check in with her
Bruce
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Yun Wang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have 7T high
