Hello Doug,
can we finish the topic this week?
Yours pfannmoe
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 09:41:17 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Bruce
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurf
Dear experts,
I had to make volumic statistical analysis for the need to use BPM toolbox.
So, I got in the output of this statistical analysis some volumic Tmaps.
As I did before some group analysis according to FStutorial, I would like
to apply the same method of Clusterwise Correction on my vol
Hi,
Is it possible to run recon-all in parallel for fastening the speed ???
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
Hi pfannmoe
you are better off including the contents of the thread when you repost.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015,
pfannmo...@uni-greifswald.de wrote:
> Hello Doug,
>
> can we finish the topic this week?
>
> Yours pfannmoe
>
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 09:41:17 -0400 (EDT)
> Bruce Fischl wr
Hi Hassan
you can either run multiple instances of recon-all (if you have enough RAM
and CPUs), or you can use the -openmp flag to
parallelize a single instance.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Hassan bakhshi wrote:
> Hi,
> Is it possible to run recon-all in parallel for fastening the sp
Does Sess14 have a double dash?
On 4/4/15 3:38 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote:
No, do you think that a folder is lacking (please see below)?
Thanks
Stefano
Messaggio originale
Da: gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Data: 3-apr-2015 7.34
A:
Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] R: Re: isxconcat-sess problem
do
I'm not sure what the problem is, but it occurs to me that computing the
mean over the cluster is probably not what should be done. Instead, the
total should be computed. In the header of that file, there should be a
command line for mri_segstats. Cut and paste that into a shell and add
--accum
Hello Doug,
is there a possibility to extract the "motion parameter" from a BBR
registration? Possibly, the first six numbers of the
register.dof6.dat.param
file are the same parameters as found in column 2 - 7 in the file:
fmcpr.mcdat
created by mc-afni2 during the FS-Fast preprocessing.
Use the (undocumented) -trgsubject flag
On 4/6/15 9:10 AM, Xiaomin Yue wrote:
Hi All,
I generated a group averaged surface using make_average_surface
successfully. Currently, I like to process the fMRI data using this
group surface, instead of fsaverage, using the fs-fast pipeline. For
do
Those numbers do not have the same interpretation as as the ones in
fmc.mcdat but they represent the same information. If you construct a
new file with the same format as fmc.mcdat but with those numbers
substituted in cols 2-7 then you should get pretty similar results.
On 4/9/15 7:04 AM, pf
Just use
--regheader subject
On 4/11/15 11:27 AM, Sabine Oligschläger wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer's,
A question regarding mri_vol2surf usage:
I have 4D functional images that are preprocessed and already in
freesurfer space. I would like to project them to the fsaverage
surface template using
If you did the analysis in the volume, then you have to do the
clusterwise correction in the volume.
On 4/13/15 6:05 AM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote:
Dear experts,
I had to make volumic statistical analysis for the need to use BPM
toolbox. So, I got in the output of this statistical analysis som
Hello,
I am having trouble setting up FreeSurfer on Linux (SUSE 10 x84_64).
I followed the installation and setup directions from the wiki, and
that was all successful. When I attempt to test the installation
though, it's clear something is not right. I tried opening freeview,
and received the fo
yes
On 4/13/15 10:32 AM, pfannmo...@uni-greifswald.de wrote:
> Just to make that point: Is it valid to apply "mcparams2extreg -mcfile
> fmc.mcdat -extreg mcextreg" after substitution of the numbers in
> "register.dof6.dat.param" into "fmc.mcdat"? Is the result for the motion
> regressors valid?
Just to make that point: Is it valid to apply "mcparams2extreg -mcfile
fmc.mcdat -extreg mcextreg" after substitution of the numbers in
"register.dof6.dat.param" into "fmc.mcdat"? Is the result for the motion
regressors valid?
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:15:08 -0400
Douglas Greve wrote:
>
> Tho
Hello Douglas,
Thanks but even if I do the clusterwise correction in the volume, I can't
get an clusterwise corrected output volume image. The only things I have
are the Tmaps that I can threshold if wanted.
And I would like to project on fsaverage surface the results of the
clusterwise correctio
Does the BPM toolbox (what's that?) not give you cluster correction? You
can try using mri_volcluster with the --grf option, but you'll need to
know the FWHM. Afterwards you can map the result to the surface
On 4/13/15 10:46 AM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote:
Hello Douglas,
Thanks but even if I do
By the mean of SPM, the Biological Parmatring toolbox can do the FWE
correction and give me results on a glass brain. But I don't have any
cluster wise corrected P-maps on output.
Or did I miss something ?
Best regards,
Matthieu
2015-04-13 16:51 GMT+02:00 Douglas Greve :
> Does the BPM toolbo
Hi Doug,
Kindly I have the following questions regarding the command mri_segstats:
* I wanted to use the flag --seg-erode 2 in the command mri_segstats
but I am receiving an error message that this flag is not available ( I am
using FreeSurfer 5.3.0 ).
* When the command recon-
Dear Freesurfer Experts,
I am performing the automated segmentation of hippocampal subfield on an
elderly clinical population with a generalized pattern of atrophy. I
understand that the subfields are segmented using a Bayesian inference
approach and a probabilistic atlas based on normal brains.
Try this one
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/mri_segstats
This is for linux. If that is not your system, tell me what your system is
doug
On 04/13/2015 02:22 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Kindly I have the following questions regarding the comman
Hi Doug,
My system is Linux Centos 7
I tried to run it and I got:
[malshikh@glia 002201]$ mri_segstats --seg mri/aseg.mgz --sum stats/aseg.stats
--pv mri/norm.mgz --empty --excludeid 0 --excl-ctxgmwm --supratent
--subcortgray --in mri/norm.mgz --in-intensity-name norm --in-intensity-units
MR
On 04/08/2015 03:45 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm performing the FS-FAST for functional connectivity analysis on two
> groups.
>
> I'm using tkmedit to visualize the results. Is possible to load a
> scatter plot which describes the values of each subject for each
> selected
If 4.5 will actually run on 5.0 preprocessed data, then I think it
should be ok, but it has been a very long time since 4.5 so I can't say
with any confidence.
doug
On 04/08/2015 01:33 PM, Katie Bettencourt wrote:
> I had a question about using different components of Freesurfer 4.5
> and F
clusterwise correction is a type of FWE correction. If the FWE you are
using is good enough for you and you want to visualize the results on a
surface, then use mri_vol2surf. If this was done on the SPM template
space, then run the SPM T1 template through recon-all to get the surfaces
On 0
Are you sure you're using the new version?
what do you get if you type
which mri_segstats
On 04/13/2015 03:41 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> My system is Linux Centos 7
>
> I tried to run it and I got:
>
> [malshikh@glia 002201]$ mri_segstats --seg mri/aseg.mgz --sum
> stats/ase
I got
/usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_1_0/bin/mri_segstats
and this is really weird because I thought that I am using FS 5.0.3.
I am sourcing routinely the following script before I start FS
#!/bin/tcsh
setenv FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0
setenv USE_STABLE5_3_0
setenv LD_LIB
maybe zeke can help you sort it out
On 04/13/2015 04:24 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
> I got
>
> /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_1_0/bin/mri_segstats
>
> and this is really weird because I thought that I am using FS 5.0.3.
>
> I am sourcing routinely the following script before I start FS
>
> #!/
Thank you Doug,
Kindly one more question regarding mri_segstats:
The following two mri_segstats command lines:
mri_segstats --seg ${out1}/${i}/mri/aseg.mgz --sum
${out1}/${i}/stats/aseg.stats --pv ${out1}/${i}/mri/norm.mgz --empty
--excludeid 0 --excl-ctxgmwm --supratent --subcortgray --in
${o
Only the structures in the color table (--ctab) are reported; the 1st
ctab does not have those strcutures. In the 2nd, does
On 04/13/2015 04:41 PM, Alshikho, Mohamad J. wrote:
> Thank you Doug,
> Kindly one more question regarding mri_segstats:
> The following two mri_segstats command lines:
>
>
Thank you very much for your help
By the way I added the following line
source $FREESURFER_HOME/SetUpFreeSurfer.sh
to my fs script to source FS 5.0.3 and it worked. Now I can use --seg-erode
with mri_segstats
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.
Dear Freesurfers,
Can someone please explain to me why WLS was chosen as the method of
regression?
Thank you very much!
Sincerely,
Ye
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfe
Hello Freesurfers,
I would like to be a little more specific about my question. Was
heteroskedasticity a reason for Weighted Least Square (WLS)? If so, how did
Freesurfer determine the weights?
Thank you!
Sincerely,
Ye
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:59 PM, ye tian wrote:
> Dear Freesurfers,
>
>
Hi Doug,
Sorry which file should the mri_segstats command be in? Also, I am still
unclear on how the individual values in cache.th13.abs.y.ocn.dat are
calculated. Could you possibly explain this?
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Australia
Neuroscience Re
This does not change anything, but it appears that in either case, the
directory is untarred. (I can not tell if the error matters.) So I wanted to go
further and see about running the examples in:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/OutputData_freeview
I have a new problem: th
Thanks very much.
Xiaomin
> On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Douglas Greve wrote:
>
> Use the (undocumented) -trgsubject flag
>
>> On 4/6/15 9:10 AM, Xiaomin Yue wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I generated a group averaged surface using make_average_surface
>> successfully. Currently, I like to proce
36 matches
Mail list logo