Hi Gunjan
15 min is about what it is going to take. You could do it faster but then
the failure rate would go up. We've tuned it to improve automaticity and
reduce failures quite a bit.
cheers
Bruce
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014, Gunjan Gautam wrote:
Hi,
I used recon-all with all and its taking a
Thanks,
And what about the binary brain mask? I am able to see only the stripped
volume but need the binary brain mask as well.
Gunjan
On Nov 23, 2014 8:49 PM, "Bruce Fischl" wrote:
> Hi Gunjan
>
> 15 min is about what it is going to take. You could do it faster but then
> the failure rate woul
Dear Freesurfers,
Please fill in my 1-minute anonymous survey (for more info, see text below):
https://qtrial2014az1.az1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_8HdufImIrB3JXyR
My name is Alejandro (Sasha) Vicente Grabovetsky. I took a break from
Neuroimaging to work on my other passion, science communication
we don't have a binary one, but all voxels in brainmask.mgz that are >5
are in brain and everything <5 is not in brain
cheers
Bruce
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Gunjan
Gautam wrote:
Thanks,
And what about the binary brain mask? I am able to see only the stripped
volume but need the binary brain m
Ok thank you Bruce
On Nov 23, 2014 10:37 PM, "Bruce Fischl" wrote:
> we don't have a binary one, but all voxels in brainmask.mgz that are >5
> are in brain and everything <5 is not in brain
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Gunjan Gautam wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> And what about the bi
Hi Bruce,
Sorry, I did a poor job of describing the problem.
We are trying to do an analysis of subject specific abnormalities on the
surface. Instead of a traditional analysis assuming that patients have
homogenous abnormalities (for example cortical thinning in anterior
cingulate) relative to a
Hi Tim
I don't think there's a general relationship as it will depend on the
geometry of the lesions and of the cortical surface. I guess what I would
do is threshold the lesions in the volume, map them to the surface and see
what the statistics of their areas are, then use that for thresholdi
Hi Thomas,
I want to analyze the data in native surface space. The functional volume
data could be register to native surface with bbregister, however, the
resolution of the native surface is quite high, too much nodes for
computational capacity to me. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ting
On Fri, Nov 21, 2
Gentleman
Which Version of Freesurfer should I download for use with the OS X Yosemite
10.10.1?
Thanks
Cristian
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in t
Hi Ting,
What I usually do is to project my functional data to fsaverage space
and then smooth and downsample to whatever resolution I want. There
are different fsaverage resolution meshes, like fsaverage5 (~20k
vertices) and fsaverage6 (~80k vertices). This can be achieved using
standard freesurf
Thanks for your reply with detailed explanation. I am interested in what if we
apply analysis on native surface first. Still wondering:)
Ting
> On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Thomas Yeo wrote:
>
> Hi Ting,
>
> What I usually do is to project my functional data to fsaverage space
> and then sm
Hi Bruce,
What about the voxels having value equal to 5 (if exists) ?
Gunjan
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Gunjan Gautam
wrote:
> Ok thank you Bruce
> On Nov 23, 2014 10:37 PM, "Bruce Fischl"
> wrote:
>
>> we don't have a binary one, but all voxels in brainmask.mgz that are >5
>> are in b
12 matches
Mail list logo
