Hi Zhuangming
by default we use the interior ("?h.white") surface for computing area,
but you can specify the pial to mris_anatomical_stats if you want instead.
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014, 沈庄明 wrote:
Hi Doug, Sorry for forgetting to post to the list. The figure attached to
this ema
By default, just the interior, though it is possible to get measures
from the exterior
doug
On 3/7/14 1:09 AM, 沈庄明 wrote:
Hi Doug,
Sorry for forgetting to post to the list. The figure
attached to this email could illustrate my qu
Hi Sasa,
no time frame for 6.0 release as far as I know.
since you only processed the first time point, I'd recommend to
re-process everything with 5.3.
Never process one time point with one version and the other with a
different version!
Theoretically you could run the second time point with
I have a expert segmentation and i want to transform this file to GCA
space. However, i first need to have the segmentation in conformed space
cause the segmentation is 256x256x278 1mm and has a different origin. I
tried the following:
>> mri_convert -rl orig.mgz -rt nearest mySeg.nii.gz mySeg_con
Hi Doug,
I ran a group analysis comparing a trait between two groups (Diseased vs
Controls) with one continuous variable (age), with the following design
matrices [1 -1 0 0] and [0 0 1 -1]. When I loaded the significance map and
the descriptor file, the age slope of the trait in Controls was posit
Hello Chris,
Extremely coincidentally I just recently started researching subtle
variations between recon-all when run on OSX vs Linux, and just
yesterday found the EXACT same thing. The OSX build does not support
openmp whereas the Linux build does and I get very minor but detectable
differen
Do you get the same difference if you run an open MP version but force
it to use only one thread?
doug
On 03/07/2014 03:52 PM, Z K wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> Extremely coincidentally I just recently started researching subtle
> variations between recon-all when run on OSX vs Linux, and just
> ye
Was the difference in the age slopes significant? Ie, and interaction
between age and group. If so, then you have to proceed with caution (at
least one statistician told me not to proceed at at:) because the
difference in the intercepts between the two groups will depend on age
making it very
none of our tools use the nifti origin (and we don't have a way to set
it). Do you need it for something else? FSL or SPM may have tools that
can set it
On 03/07/2014 02:40 PM, Oualid Benkarim wrote:
> I have a expert segmentation and i want to transform this file to GCA
> space. However, i fi
Hi Andrea,
You can use the contour tool in the voxel edit mode to quickly and roughly
fill in wm. Use the tool with the wm.mgz selected in the volume layer
list but set the brainmask (or T1) as the reference. Set brush value to
255, and then do crtl+alt+leftbutton while dragging the mouse to a
Hi Pfannmoe,
I don't believe it is possible to edit a voxel via tcl scripts. If so the
command would be listed on this page:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/TkMeditGuide/TkMeditReference/TkMeditScripting
-Louis
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if I have sel
Hi Rujing,
You might try drawing in the wm thicker than it is already. Also, check
there are no disconnects between the wm voxels in the wm.mgz.
-Louis
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, charujing123 wrote:
Hi all.
In troubleshooting, I want to sign some area as white matter by control point
and wm edit.
The openmp version did use only one thread.
I used the vtk build in the tarball of precompiled support libraries on the
Freesurfer ftp site. I tried building vtk 5.8 and still had the same issues. It
is not a big deal because this exercise was more to do with the computational
components rather
Thanks Doug. I wasn't clear in my DOSS question, I meant to ask why are
categoricalXcontinuous interactions (e.g. such as the one probed by the
contrast "Does the thickness-age correlation differ between group A and
B?") still created in DOSS analyses, when by definition DOSS imposes that
(e.g.) th
On 03/07/2014 06:45 PM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
> Thanks Doug. I wasn't clear in my DOSS question, I meant to ask why
> are categoricalXcontinuous interactions (e.g. such as the one probed
> by the contrast "Does the thickness-age correlation differ between
> group A and B?") still created in DOSS
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your reply. Yes there were areas of significant difference
reported in the age slopes maps, after the mri_glmfit command was run.
However, I haven't checked to see yet whether there are surviving clusters
after correction for multiple comparisons. I see, yes that definitely
mak
16 matches
Mail list logo