"A funded PhD Student position will be available in the “Brain and Imaging”
Inserm unit (national institute for health) settled in Tours, France, from
October 1st, 2014 to September 30th, 2017.
During this time period, the candidate will have: (1) to develop tools and
pertinent criteria for com
Hi Doug,
A follow-up. I've gone back and re-done the registration using nifti file with
the ICA20 maps. I noticed in tkregister2 that when I press on the TARGET tab
there is extremely good alignment ( i think it is to 'orig.mgz' in the mri
folder of my subject which I had processed using recon
Hello Freesurfer Expert,
I am working on volumetric analysis of Hippocampus.
When i am find the no of voxel's for left Hippocampus (17) and Right
Hippocampus(53) using command i m getting some what diffrence.
I just want to know which command should be used for the volumetric
analysis:
Lh
Zeke -
Thank you for getting back in touch with me. I have since grabbed the
source distribution to see if I can compile this beast on my own ...
quite the arduous task indeed. It would be great to see the configure
options that were used to create the public stable 5 release, still
looking around
On 3/6/14 6:39 AM, Xuelong Zhao wrote:
Hi Doug,
A follow-up. I've gone back and re-done the registration using nifti
file with the ICA20 maps. I noticed in tkregister2 that when I press
on the TARGET tab there is extremely good alignment ( i think it is to
'orig.mgz' in the mri folder of my
The one from asegsats2table takes into account partial volume information
doug
On 3/6/14 7:13 AM, Saurabh Thakur wrote:
Hello Freesurfer Expert,
I am working on volumetric analysis of Hippocampus.
When i am find the no of voxel's for left Hippocampus (17) and Right
Hippocampus(53) using co
Sorry, couple more questions:
1) I know that QDEC's/mri_glmfit's equivalent in FSL ("randomise") applies
the GLM by doing permutations, and so already corrects for multiple
comparisons in the process. How similar is this to what Monte-Carlo does
(i.e. controlling FWE via repeated simulations) upon
On 03/06/2014 10:34 AM, krista kelly wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> Maybe I was mistaken. In your previous email when you said "do not
> spec --label-thresh", I thought that you were saying not to use that
> option and to just use --slabel for the V1.thresh.label. I've done
> that using this command:
>
On 03/06/2014 10:35 AM, Tudor Popescu wrote:
> Sorry, couple more questions:
>
> 1) I know that QDEC's/mri_glmfit's equivalent in FSL ("randomise")
> applies the GLM by doing permutations, and so already corrects for
> multiple comparisons in the process. How similar is this to what
> Monte-Car
There is not an easy way. Start by converting the annotation to a
segmentation (mri_annotation2label with --seg output). Binarize the
label you are interested in (mri_binarize --i annotseg.mgh --match 2021
--o rh-pericalcarine.mgh), then run mri_surfcluster --in
rh-pericalcarine.mgh --thmin .5
Hello,
I am new to freesurfer. I went through the Wiki and FAQ's but
couldn't find information on
the format of the input for recon-all. I understand that one of
the input files must have a ".dcm" extension.
I have a CD which has MRI scanned images.
Just to follow-up, the sd command is an alias for setting the SUBJECTS_DIR
environmental variable to the present working directory.
Mihaela was able to get rid of the "Bad fd number" error by running the
following commands on her ubuntu workstation. It seems like this error is
not freesurfer-
They do not have to have a dcm extension. The 180 files represent many
slices from a single volume (or multiple volumes). You need to find out
which ones are which. One way to do this is to run
dcmunpack -src path-to-dicom folder
this will look through all the folders and files under path-to-d
Hi Sravan , please post to the list and not to us personally. Thanks!
This is just a list of what you (or whoever you are working with
acquired), so I don't know what is in there. Probably #2 is what you
want, less sure about #4
doug
On 03/06/2014 03:34 PM, Mattevada, Sravan wrote:
> Hello Do
Thanks Doug
I started the #2 and its running.
Sorry about the personal e-mail.
Thanks
Sravan
-Original Message-
From: Douglas N Greve [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 3:02 PM
To: Mattevada, Sravan; Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurf
Hi Doug,
Sorry for forgetting to post to the list. The figure attached to this email
could illustrate my questions. The blue region in the figure is a cortical
parcellation (i.e. precentral) obtained by FreeSurfer. As I understand, the
cortical parcellation has its own thickness (maybe 2~3mm
16 matches
Mail list logo