Dear Bruce, Allison,
Thank you for your answer.
In tkmedit the surfaces look good.
Can this concavity mean that sulci are deeper in this region as
compared to neighboring regions? I am not sure I understand how to
interpret the inflated surface, therefore I cannot control if it is
correct.
Best
for occipital patches you can try running mris_flatten with -complete.
This will use the complete distance matrix instead of a random sampling of
it
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 29
Apr 2011, Don Hagler wrote:
>
> For retinotopy, I find it convenient to use the sphere surface. It does not
> require
no, I don't think it means that. It has more to do with the overall shape
of the brain I believe, but we've never really investigated it
On Sat, 30
Apr 2011, Tetiana Dadakova wrote:
> Dear Bruce, Allison,
>
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> In tkmedit the surfaces look good.
> Can this concavity
