From: Hoekstra, Liesbeth
Sent: Wed 12/8/2010 11:11
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: talairach and scullstrip, order and control points, questions
L.S.,
Let me start by saying that you've got a wonderful webpage!
I'm a beginner in the Freesurfer fi
Hi!
I have ran through the recon-all --long for a series of subjects. For
each of the two timepoints, I also have FDG-PET. I want to integrate the
PET-data with the longitudinal data. Cross-sectionally I would just
coregister T1 and PET, but now that I have the longitudinal runs I
wonder how this
Dear freesurfers,
I believe it is recommended to have two high-resolution images for one
subject (same acquisition parameters) for recon-all (i.e. 001.mgz and
002.mgz in /mri/orig). I'm sure recon works, however, with just one image
(001.mgz). What is the relative advantage of having two images? W
Hi Joon,
it depends on your field strength, receive coil and amount of
acceleration. For example, at 3t with a 12 channel and 2x acceleration 1
acquisition is probably better than two as the blurring from motion
correction hurts the CNR more than the noise reduction helps it. At 1.5T
with a si
I may be that the default max is less than the min you have set. You may
have to set the max with -fmax.
doug
Xiaoqian Jenny Chai wrote:
> I am having trouble displaying sig.mgh using tkmedit. The sig.mgh file
> was generated from a group regression analysis of FA images using
> mri_glmfit.
>
>
Hi Yuko,
The contrast only allows you to constrain the anatomical ROI. If you
don't spec a contrast, then it uses the whole anat ROI. Nothing gets
averaged until you run funcroi-table-sess, and that only averages over
the given contrast (unless you use -vol in which case it just reports
the vo
It depends on what you want to test exactly. You can just weight each
presentation and test against fixation as you suggest. This implies that
the response amp is 0 when your weight is 0. If that's not the case,
then you need to make a modification. Let me know if you need that.
doug
Katie
There's nothing special that we have set up to do this. I would register
both TPs to the base.
doug
Per Selnes wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have ran through the recon-all --long for a series of subjects. For
> each of the two timepoints, I also have FDG-PET. I want to integrate the
> PET-data with the lon
I'm not sure if that's exactly what I am saying. Basically, there is an
area in the brain (which I am trying to localize) that tracks the number of
items you are holding in memory so that the more items you hold in memory,
the higher the bold activation. We have behavioral results saying how many
It comes down to whether you think there will be 0 activation in this
area if there are 0 items held in memory. If so, then what you have is fine.
doug
Katie Bettencourt wrote:
> I'm not sure if that's exactly what I am saying. Basically, there is
> an area in the brain (which I am trying to l
Hi Jesse
it seems the standard Python is not installed with your CentOS
installation. asegstats2table is a Python script and needs it.
You could either ask your sysadmin to install the Python. or if you
have the permissions.. do it yourself -- some variant of
sudo yum install python
Best,
K
Hi Krish,
Thank you very much for your time, I will install the Python.
Jesse
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Krish Subramaniam wrote:
> Hi Jesse
>
> it seems the standard Python is not installed with your CentOS
> installation. asegstats2table is a Python script and needs it.
>
> You could ei
You would represent each presentation as two different conditions, one
with a weight that is always 1, the other weighted according to your
scale. So this doubles the number of conditions. You would then test the
weighted conditions. The weight=1 conditions represent an intercept, and
the weigh
Hi,
We are trying to create a CSF volume mask from structural MEMPRAGE T1 data
(we also have ME FLASH 5/30 ->PD if needed). We are interested in two CSF
compartments:
- "superficial" CSF outside grey matter and inside inner skull
- "deep" CSF inside ventricles
Is there a way to simply extract t
Hi Tommi
you can use mri_extract_label to pull out the labels you want, but the
sulcal CSF labels may not be great since the manual labeling that is the
basis of the aseg was done on only T1 images.
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010
r...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are trying to
Thanks Bruce!
However, as you suspected this does not seem to work: mri_extract_label
mri/aseg.mgz 24 mri/mask_code24.mgz gives a tiny volume of a couple of
hundred voxels in the middle of the brain (part of 3rd ventricle). I
assume here that code 24 is the correct code for all CSF in aseg.mgz.
Hi Tommi,
no, you need to also extract the left and right ventricles and the
inferior lateral ventricles.
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 r...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
wrote:
>
> Thanks Bruce!
>
> However, as you suspected this does not seem to work: mri_extract_label
> mri/aseg.mgz 24 mri/mask_c
17 matches
Mail list logo