We do have write permission. It did report low space so we tried changing
the space on the virtual box from 8 to 16 MB. Now it doen't even power on.
Will try changing it back.
On 28 January 2010 15:36, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> is there enough space in /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/jan?
> Hi,
> I am trying to work with the fMRI files (FSL) to create some label files to
> use them as reference in phase analysis. I have never really worked with
> fMRI data or any of the software for it. I am trying to use FSL viewer
> because it seems like all the processing is done (Feat fold
These results look reasonable given what each method is doing. The FDR
blob is there because it is very bright (significant). It is lost in the
cluster-wise correction because it is small, and the cluster-wise
correction does not care how significant something is as long as it
meets threshold.
Who says FDR is more conservative? It all depends on the thresholds you choose.
Note that the FDR threshold is different from the cluster-based p
threshold, and it isn't necessarily appropriate to use the same for
both.
The cluster-based p threshold controls the overall probability that you wil
Don, why do you say that .05 is too liberal? We use a simulation-based
test, not GRF, so we don't have to worry about the GRF assumptions
breaking down at higher p-values.
doug
Don Hagler wrote:
> Who says FDR is more conservative? It all depends on the thresholds
> you choose.
>
> Note that
FDR is NOT more conservative than cluster-based methods, in general. The
smoother the data, the more conservative FDR is.
In my experience with surface-based data, FDR has been less sensitive
than cluster-based methods -- perhaps because my data was very smooth.
> Stefan Brauns wrote:
>
>> W
Hello, there,
Is there a bash version of rebuild_gca_atlas.csh?
Thanks!
Guang
_
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390710/direct/01/___
In my experience, which is more in fMRI than thickness analyses, 0.05 can yield
very large mega-clusters that should actually be considered a conglomeration of
smaller clusters. I found that regardless of whether one does Monte Carlo or
GRF. Because 0.05 for uncorrected p values is quite libe
no, sorry!
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 16:55 -0600, Guang Zeng wrote:
> Hello, there,
>
> Is there a bash version of rebuild_gca_atlas.csh?
>
> Thanks!
> Guang
>
>
> __
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get
I don't think so. Sorry
Bruce
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Guang Zeng wrote:
>
> Hello, there,
>
> Is there a bash version of rebuild_gca_atlas.csh?
>
> Thanks!
> Guang
>
> _
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
> http:/
10 matches
Mail list logo
