Also the ch2 dataset that comes with MRICro suffers from the same problem.
It's the averaging of several acquisition from one brain.
Is it possible to infer that too many acquisitions is worse than one
acquisition?
-- PPJ
2009/11/30 Bruce Fischl
> Hi Mishkin,
>
> yes, I generates surfaces for
no, it will take far less (30 minutes or so I think)
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009,
Guang Zeng wrote:
>
> Hi, there,
>
> I have 60 subjects which have been FS analyzed without the flag -qcache.
> Now, I wan to do group analysis using QDEC.
>
> I need run recon-all -s subjectid -qcache for each of my subjec
yes, we have found that with 3T and >=12 channels one is probably better
than 2. Although having 2 is good for other reasons
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009,
Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior wrote:
Also the ch2 dataset that comes with MRICro suffers from the same problem.
It's the averaging of seve
Dear FS experts
I run recon-all -long on 12 subjects (3-4 time points each) and there is a
problem with mri_aparc2aseg. The processor is running, but the the number of
labeling slices does not increase (hangs by 4 slices since hours).
The other time points of this subject as well as the cross-sec
Have you looked at the surfaces for this time poing? Does the recon for
this time point otherwise look ok?
doug
Jürgen Hänggi wrote:
> Dear FS experts
>
> I run recon-all -long on 12 subjects (3-4 time points each) and there is a
> problem with mri_aparc2aseg. The processor is running, but the t
Hi, there,
I have made our own template using 20 subjects follwoing the instruction in
FreeSurfer WIKI.
(http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SurfaceRegAndTemplates).
I have a quesition now,
Does the quality of the new template depends on the first subject I picked to
built the tempalte
Hi Guang,
I think it probably does make a difference, but we haven't quantified how
much. The initial round of registrations are pretty rigid, so it may not be
that big an effect, but Thomas Yeo (ccd) may have a different opinion.
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Guang Zeng wrote:
>
> Hi, the
Hello Freesurfer authors,
I have processed a few datasets without realising that the hemispheric
orientation was provided incorrectly i.e the labelled left hemisphere is
actually the right hemisphere.
Does this mean all the analysis is incorrect and unusable? What should I do to
correct for t
