Hi,
If I have volume data in MNI subject space (produced using --tal option
in mri_vol2vol), how do I project it onto the surface in the same
subject space? There does not seem to be an equivalent tal option in
mri_vol2surf.
Thanks,
Yigal
___
Frees
Hello,
I´d like to know if there is some way to create a ROI-label of a subcortical
structure. If there is a way, please tell me how to do.
Thanks, Kelly
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br
sure, what format would you like the ROI in?
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Kelly Silva
wrote:
Hello,
I´d like to know if there is some way to create a ROI-label of a subcortical
structure. If there is a way, please tell me how to do.
T
Hi,
I need that the ROI appears like a label, for example, together with the
parcelations of aparc.a2005s.stats/aparc.stats, becaus I have a program that
reads the labels from aparc.stats.
Thanks, Kelly
De: Bruce Fischl
Para: Kelly S
sorry, you mean in our .label format? I'm still not sure I understand.
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Kelly Silva wrote:
Hi,
I need that the ROI appears like a label, for example, together with the
parcelations of aparc.a2005s.stats/aparc.stats, becaus I have a program that
reads the labels from aparc
Try mri_cor2label (name is not very descriptive)
doug
Kelly Silva wrote:
Hello,
I´d like to know if there is some way to create a ROI-label of a
subcortical structure. If there is a way, please tell me how to do.
Thanks, Kel
1) I need the command line to visualize the segmentation of subcortical
structures, because I want to see if the segmentation of thalamus is good.
2) If the segmentation is not good, how can I make changes manually?
3) After the changes, is it necessary to run Recon2 and Recon3
again???
1)
tkmedit $subject norm.mgz -segmentation aseg.mgz
2)
there are editing tools in tkmedit you can use.
3)
you'll need to regenerate the aseg.stats file and the aparc+aseg stuff, but
if the edits aren't near cortex you don't necessarily have to. Unless you
are really trying to save computer
Thanks a lot!
De: Bruce Fischl
Para: Kelly Silva
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 2009 16:07:41
Assunto: Re: Res: Res: [Freesurfer] Subcortical Label
1)
tkmedit $subject norm.mgz -segmentation aseg.mgz
2)
there are
Dear FS experts
I am not sure whether the file cnr.mgh represents the contrast-to-noise
ration (CNR) on one hand and how to interpret it. When I loaded the cnr.mgh
in tkmedit, there is actually no image visible and only one value is shown
e.g., 0.355 or -0.965.
What do these values mean? In my op
you can use the binary mri_cnr to compute the CNR across a surface
boundary (usually gray/white). What directory did you find the cnr.mgh
file?
cheers,
Bruce
On
Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Jürgen Hänggi wrote:
Dear FS experts
I am not sure whether the file cnr.mgh represents the contrast-to-noise
r
tksurfer fsaverage lh inflated
surfer: current subjects dir: /autofs/space/ventzl_001/users/SUBJECTS_DIR
surfer: not in "scripts" dir ==> using cwd for session root
surfer: session root data dir ($session) set to:
surfer: /autofs/space/schnook_001/users/yigal/projects/functional
surfer: Readin
Hello,
I ran the following analysis to target task-specific voxels at a certain
contrast and offset.
func2roi-sess -roidef dACC10_lh -analysis EMerror -anatlabel dACC-lh
-maskcontrast ASevfix -maskframe 5 -maskthresh 1 -masktail pos -maskmap
sig -sf Subject_files/MTHFRn18-list -d $SUBJECTS_DIR
I
Sorry, I don't have anything that will do that. You could probably do it
in matlab, if you know how to program in matlab.
doug
Dave Brohawn wrote:
Hello,
I ran the following analysis to target task-specific voxels at a certain
contrast and offset.
func2roi-sess -roidef dACC10_lh -analysis
Hello, freesurfer group,
I have run qdec for comparing thickness between two groups. When qdec
does a correlation analyses for thickness versus a second variable: 1)
Does the second variable have to be a continuous interval variable or 2)
can the second variable be an ordinal variable with mor
It has to be interpreted as a continuous variable. The test is done
using a t-test inside the glm. This reduces to a Pearson if there is
only one variable and no intercept (which it is not).
doug
Xie, Hong wrote:
Hello, freesurfer group,
I have run qdec for comparing thickness betwee
On Thursday 08 January 2009 15:29:47 Dave Brohawn wrote:
> I would like to create a functional constraint including only the 25%
> most active voxels (top quartile).
>
> Is there a command that can achieve this?
>
You can use 'mris_calc' (the development version):
$>mris_calc someVolume.mgz stat
Can freesurfer flatten (and only display) a (or several) segmented
subcortical area(s), e.g. hippocampal region? If yes, can the fine
structures in such a region (such as CA1,2,3, DG, etc.) be labeled?
Thanks,
Mingwu
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Free
Dear FS statistical experts
We would like to compared a single subject against a group using FS
statistical machinery. There is a paper by Salat et al., Hippocampus, 2006,
in which the amnestic patient H.M. was compared against 4 control subjects.
How valid is such a statistical test in FS?
Does
19 matches
Mail list logo