[Freesurfer] Re: Focusing on Relevant Areas

2008-11-25 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Moe, you could draw a label and use it to mask, but usually you want to show the whole activation pattern so people get a better sense of the data. cheers, Bruce On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Zeidan, Mohamed A. wrote: Hello, I'm doing a volume analysis and have found activation in my region of

Re: [Freesurfer] fs-fast smoothing

2008-11-25 Thread Doug Greve
Hi Scott, you should skip steps 2-6 (that is the old stream). Instead, run isxconcat-sess after #1, then smooth on the surface either in isxconcat-sess or with mri_surf2surf before running mri_glmfit. doug Scott Gorlin wrote: Hi, I'd like some clarification on the recommended procedure for

[Freesurfer] Segmentation Volume Data

2008-11-25 Thread Yuan Xu
Hi FreeSurfer:  when I compare a brain structure volume count on the aseg.stats files with a volume of same structure measured using tkmedit "Segmentation Label Volume Count" feature to display on TkMedit Tools window. They are closer but not the same, usually about 3 to 10% difference. Why? Th

Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation Volume Data

2008-11-25 Thread Doug Greve
The aseg.stats is computed with a partial volume correction at the boundaries of the structures, tkmedit just counts voxels. Yuan Xu wrote: Hi FreeSurfer: when I compare a brain structure volume count on the aseg.stats files with a volume of same structure measured using tkmedit "Se

Re: [Freesurfer] fs-fast smoothing

2008-11-25 Thread Scott Gorlin
Thanks Doug, though I'm still a bit confused: I'd like to see the smoothed results on the individuals, not just the group - so it seems isxconcat-sess wouldn't be appropriate. Are you suggesting running mri_surf2surf directly on the contrast sig.nii files? Is smoothing a significance map the

[Freesurfer] Making Label - segfault?

2008-11-25 Thread Zeidan, Mohamed A.
Hi Everyone, I'm trying to create a label but as I'm highlighting the area of interest in tkmedit, the window closes out and I get the following message: ERROR: A segfault has occurred. This is not your fault, : but is most likely an unrecoverable error and has : made the program unstable.

Re: [Freesurfer] fs-fast smoothing

2008-11-25 Thread Doug Greve
Oh, in that case the easiest thing to do is to smooth the raw data on the surface. If you have a development version of freesurfer, you can do this with preproc-sess using the -surf-fwhm option doug Scott Gorlin wrote: Thanks Doug, though I'm still a bit confused: I'd like to see the smooth

[Freesurfer] RE: Focusing on Relevant Areas

2008-11-25 Thread Zeidan, Mohamed A.
Hi Bruce, Thanks for your reply. As a relatively new freesurfer user, could you tell me where to find the instructions on how to use the label to mask? Sorry for such a trivial question. Thanks, Moe -Original Message- From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 11/25/2008

Re: [Freesurfer] Making Label - segfault?

2008-11-25 Thread Krish Subramaniam
Hi Moe Could you send us the data ( sig.nii .. directly to my email if it's not big enough ). What steps do you take so that I can mimic the crash here? Thanks Krish On Nov 25, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Zeidan, Mohamed A. wrote: Hi Everyone, I'm trying to create a label but as I'm highlighting

Re: [Freesurfer] fs-fast smoothing

2008-11-25 Thread Scott Gorlin
no, i'm using 4.1 stable. is the development version open to the public? (i don't see anything here: http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/dev-releases/) Or a patch/some minor edits I can copy into preproc-sess? Or a *not the easiest* way :)? thanks again Doug Greve wrote: Oh, in that