I have an older dataset with .938 x .938 x 2mm resolution but good contrast
and SNR. In previous posts, I have seen recommendations to not exceed 1.5 mm
thickness for z-plane. I was wondering if this resolution was equally
problematic for volume (aseg) labeling, similar to the surface path.
Thanks
Hi Brian,
no, the aseg should be fine. The truth is that the surfaces will probably
work as well, but the thickness estimates probably won't be terribly
good. It should be ok for functional overlay and inter-subject averaging
though.
cheers,
Bruce
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Brian C. Schweinsburg
Thanks Bruce. I'll give it a try then.
Brian
On 1/26/08 10:15 AM, "Bruce Fischl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> no, the aseg should be fine. The truth is that the surfaces will probably
> work as well, but the thickness estimates probably won't be terribly
> good. It should be ok fo
Hi,
I keep getting an error when I submit jobs to seychelles that a COR-.info
file cannot be found. Do you know why this would be? I pasted the full
command and error log below.
Thanks!
Cameron
recon-all -i /space/grouch/4/users/ponce/ponce_002d2/3danat/003 -i
/space/grouch/4/users/ponce/ponce_
what is in space/grouch/4/users/ponce/ponce_002d2/3danat/003? If they are
dicoms try giving it one slice in the right series instead of the whole
directory
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Cameron Ellis wrote:
Hi,
I keep getting an error when I submit jobs to seychelles that a COR-.info
file cannot be fou
Hi Christine,
what subject are you overlaying the results on? If it's fsaverage (our
average subject) then it should have ?h.aparc.annot files in the label
subdirectory that you can load file->label->import annotation.
cheers,
Bruce
On Fri, 25 Jan
2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I am us
