Hi
I have a dataset originally processed with the Autumn 2005 FS version
(2.2?). I know need wm segs, and in order to get this, I've tried to run
-cortribbon -cortparc -cortparc2 -aparc2aseg -wmparc
But the cc doesn't get labeled in the cortparc, and consequently (?) not
in the wmparc either.
I
Hi Kristine,
you can just run mri_cc directly if you want:
mri_cc -o aseg_with_cc.mgz $subject
cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a dataset originally processed with the Autumn 2005 FS version
(2.2?). I know need wm segs, and in order to get this, I've tri
Thanks!
The MRI_cc works fine. It's just that I want to use the entire wmparc, and
I worry that it may be skewed when the cc is not in there. The cingulate
parcellations look a little off. Do you think there's any step in
-autorecon2 (before -cortribbon) after the aseg I might try to start
reproce
Dear Experts,
after ages of monkey scanning, we recently also included human
subjects in our study. I would like to use freesurfer for surface
reconstruction, mainly as "canvas" for the display of activation maps.
While functional scans seem to be reasonable, the anatomicals taken
on our S
Hi Sebastian,
we put together some Allegra-specific postprocessing tools that helped for
Mike Chee (ccd). Maybe Mike can give you the benefit of his experience?
cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Dear Experts,
after ages of monkey scanning, we recently also include
Hi Bruce,
thanks for your quick response.
On Jan 22, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
we put together some Allegra-specific postprocessing tools that
helped for Mike Chee (ccd). Maybe Mike can give you the benefit of
his experience?
That would be marvellous. Th
Hi Kristine,
I'll leave this for Nick and Doug.
Bruce
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks!
The MRI_cc works fine. It's just that I want to use the entire wmparc, and
I worry that it may be skewed when the cc is not in there. The cingulate
parcellations look a little off. Do
Kristine,
You should be able to use -ccseg which occurs after the aseg is created in
-autorecon2. First, you will need to copy your aseg.mgz to aseg.auto.mgz
as this is the file that -ccseg will work on (in the dev version of FS, it
uses the aseg.mgz).
Allison
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008
[EMAIL P
Hello,
Kristine's earlier post got me wondering why she was "losing" any
previous aseg edits if her data were re-processed under FS v4, since it
was my simple understanding that all edits (e.g., control points,
brainmaks, talairach, white matter, aseg) are intended to be preserved,
unless you expl
Hi Michael,
On Jan 22, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Michael Chee wrote:
Hi Sebastian and Bruce,
I'll respond by the end of the week as I have some things to tend to
presently.
Cool, thanks a lot and no hurry (no(t much) time this week either
for testing/acquiring new anatomical scans myself).
ahoi &
If you have problems writing out mgh files with 14x1x1x500 volumes, maybe
you need more memory (>=2GB?). Or a 64 bit machine? Or you could downsample
your time courses if you haven't already.
I do use matlab to convert decimated source time course files (stc) to mgh.
Before writing out
Hi Don, have you tried using mri_surf2surf with --mapmethod nnf ? That
will prevent the interpolation and map each ico4 to the nearest ico7.
doug
Don Hagler wrote:
If you have problems writing out mgh files with 14x1x1x500
volumes, maybe you need more memory (>=2GB?). Or a 64 bit mach
12 matches
Mail list logo
