Hi Jess,
I agree with Jenni. It looks like it missed some of the white matter,
which is why it also didn't get the pial surface. Was the wm.mgz accurate
there? If it was, then the problem is probably the topology fixer. If
not, then putting control points in the white matter would be my
sugge
Hi,
I am new to FreeSurfer and even after having read the wiki, I have a
few questions regarding the coordinate systems.
1. What coordinate system do the final surfaces have. ie. mris_convert
rh.pial rh.pial.ascii will list the coordinates in what space?
2. Are the coordinates of T1.mgz and rh.p
Hi Alex,
sorry, this is an unintended consequence of the code that prevents the
surface from deforming into non-cortical structures. I'll see if I can
fix it and get you a new version.
cheers,
Bruce
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Alexander Fornito
wrote:
Hi,
I've been consistently getting errors in
one thing that comes to mind is that the pvalues produced by glmfit are
two-sided. What does SPSS use?
Goldman, Aaron (NIH/NIMH) [C] wrote:
Hi, I've been looking at thickness data and Freesurfer, and had a
question about the process. I initially compared thickness in our two
groups on a node-
Hello FS-list,
Could you please confirm the recommended current approach for
calculating the total cortical gray matter volume.
Based on the following Wiki page
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/MorphometryStats?
action=highlight&value=mris_volume
I presume that the recommended calculatio
That would be great. Thanks Bruce.
> Hi Alex,
>
> sorry, this is an unintended consequence of the code that prevents the
> surface from deforming into non-cortical structures. I'll see if I can
> fix it and get you a new version.
>
> cheers,
> Bruce
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Alexander Fornito
> wrote
