the easiest thing to do is check the quality of the parcellations. If
they look good then nothing major went wrong with the registration
cheers
Bruce
On Sun,
21 Dec 2014, Jason Tourville wrote:
Thanks for looking into the Bruce. Is there a standard protocol for checking
the surface registrat
Thanks for looking into the Bruce. Is there a standard protocol for
checking the surface registrations?
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
>
> Hi Jason
>
> as I discovered today poking through the code, make_average_subject calls
> mris_make_template and also creates a bunch of
Hi Jason
as I discovered today poking through the code, make_average_subject calls
mris_make_template and also creates a bunch of other useful things (average
volumes and asegs and such), so I would use it
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, Jason Tourville wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. We
Thanks for the feedback. We may have sufficient numbers for binning.
Regarding template creation, the wiki lists two methods, one that involve
"make_average_subject" and another that involves "mris_make_template". For
our purpose, which is to generate a pediatric surface template for use on a
larg
Hi Jason
I would say at least 15, but you can also just check to see when things
start to asymptote. I think Christophe found there were diminishing returns
after 12 or so, but things have changed somewhat since then, and of course
it will depend on the variance on your population.
cheers
Bruc
Hi Jason,
I saw this last week. I *think* the original template was on 40 brains,
so 40 seems like a good number. In my opinion the bigger issue is the 8
year age range. A 3-year-old's head is much smaller than an
11-year-old's. I'm not sure I would mix them, and if there are enough
subjects
