Ths is a topological error that can be fixed with mris_fix_topology. But this
does not look human ...
On 12/8/2020 3:34 PM, Jie Zhao wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hello Freesurfer Team
I have some questions about the inflated surface. As is shown in the attached
pictures, ther
Those are not important, just a few divots that did not get smoothed out
during the inflation. The only thing that you need to be concerned about
is the accuracy of the white and pial surfaces when viewed on the MRI
volume. the inflated surface is only for visualization
On 09/03/2016 10:22 AM,
Hi Xin-Fa
looking at the inflated surface tells you almost nothing. Look at the
white/pial over the volume and the aseg
cheers
Bruce
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, Xinfa Shi wrote:
Hi everyone ,
Recently surface check have been bothering me ,and I cannot quickly find
surface error . Unintentionally
Dear Bruce,
Thank you very much! It works like a charm!
Sincerely,
Ye
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Ye
>
> almost certainly not. Try running mris_euler_number - it will tell you the
> topology of the surface (which is the same for inflated/white/pial/...)
> cheers
>
Hi Ye
almost certainly not. Try running mris_euler_number - it will tell you
the topology of the surface (which is the same for inflated/white/pial/...)
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, ye tian wrote:
Dear Freesurfers,
My inflated surface looks smooth in tksurfer, but white matter surface h
no, I don't think it means that. It has more to do with the overall shape
of the brain I believe, but we've never really investigated it
On Sat, 30
Apr 2011, Tetiana Dadakova wrote:
> Dear Bruce, Allison,
>
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> In tkmedit the surfaces look good.
> Can this concavity
Dear Bruce, Allison,
Thank you for your answer.
In tkmedit the surfaces look good.
Can this concavity mean that sulci are deeper in this region as
compared to neighboring regions? I am not sure I understand how to
interpret the inflated surface, therefore I cannot control if it is
correct.
Best
I agree, sometimes this happens in the inflated surface and I don't think
it's cause for concern
Bruce
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Allison Stevens wrote:
> When you look at the case in tkmedit, in that same area, do you see an error?
> Looking at your snapshot, it looks like it could be normal.
>
> On
When you look at the case in tkmedit, in that same area, do you see an error?
Looking at your snapshot, it looks like it could be normal.
On Apr 26, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Tetiana Dadakova wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer list,
>
> When I look at inflated surface of my subjects (healthy males and
> females
looks ok to me, but it's hard to say from just an inflated surface
On Sat, 8
Nov 2008, Nurunisa Neyzi wrote:
Hello, I just wanted to ask what you think makes this inflated surface
look somewhat wrong in the occipital lobe? (Or is it OK?)
I attached the figure. Thanks a lot !
-Nurunisa-
_
you don't need to worry about the little bumps on the inflated
On Thu, 19
Apr 2007, Turner, Jessica wrote:
Ok, should I be concerned about the little pimples on the rh inflated
surface (see attached)? The left hemisphere on the same subject tends to
be much smoother. If it's worthy worrying
Nam,
Are you using Linux Fedora Core and an NVidia graphics
card? If so, then I have seen a problem where just a snippet
of a surface is displayed in tksurfer. The solution is to
upgrade the nvidia driver. You will have to go to the
nvidia web site to get that driver.
Nick
> Hi all,
>
> I've
12 matches
Mail list logo
