Thank you for correcting this. This in fact works. Alternatively after
re-running the pipeline with reinit=1 for so many times, as it tried
different initialization each time I managed to get the tract.
All the best,
-Arman
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Anastasia Yendiki <
ayend...@nmr.mgh.h
Hi Arman - I changed one of your 5 controls points for the forceps major
to make sure that the initial path is well within the white matter,
following the approach I described to Bryon in my previous email. I'm
attaching the edited text file, please save it in the dlabel/diff/
directory of yo
Dear Anastasia,
Thanks for the suggestions. The new control point didn't help. Therefore I
uploaded remaining images. It would be great if you could have a look
again.
All the best,
Arman
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Anastasia Yendiki <
ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Arman - On
Hi Arman - Yes, this looks like a tough one. This subject has
mega-ventricles and a pretty thin, oddly shaped forceps minor. I can't
actually test if this'll work b/c the bedpost directory is missing from
the uploaded data, but can you please try changing the 2nd control point
in this text fi
Dear Anastasia,
Thanks for your response. I have sent a subject that the problem in forceps
minor persists.
What I have done so far was to re-run the pipeline with "reinit=1", check
the eigenvectors, increase control points, switch off brain anatomical mask
in dmric. It made the tracts look better
Hi Arman - Have you ruled out any issues with the gradient directions? In
situations where the problem is wide-spread, this seems to be the usual
suspect. If you've checked the eigenvectors and they're ok, can you send
an example case where the problem persists? You can use this page to
uploa
