sure. Check back in a few months.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Samuel Inverso wrote:
> Ok, I would be interested in your damaged white mater tools when it's
> released (or even if its in a generally usable form now) as I'm working
> with a large data set of multiple sclerosis subjects.
>
> C
Ok, I would be interested in your damaged white mater tools when it's
released (or even if its in a generally usable form now) as I'm working
with a large data set of multiple sclerosis subjects.
Cheers,
-Sam
On 30/11/2009 11:54 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> not for the default workflow, no. Ther
not for the default workflow, no. There are other things we are working on
such as damaged white matter estimation that would benefit, but nothing
released.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Samuel Inverso wrote:
> Thank you for the quick reply Bruce.
> I'm new to freesurfer, do you know if
Thank you for the quick reply Bruce.
I'm new to freesurfer, do you know if there is any benefit to including
T2 in the process workflow somewhere?
Cheers,
-Sam
On 30/11/2009 11:35 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> yes, just the T1.
>
> cheers,
> Bruce
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Samuel Inverso wrote:
>
>>
yes, just the T1.
cheers,
Bruce
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Samuel Inverso wrote:
> Hi Freesurfers,
>
> Looking through the mail archives it seems T1 and T2 runs for a single
> subject should not be combined when doing recon-all.
> Is this still the case?
>
> Thank you for your time,
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Sa
