d.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Slice order default
slice time correction is not used by default
On 01/28/2016 01:16 PM, Rodriguez-Thompson, Anais wrote:
> Hi Freesurfer experts,
>
> I just starting using slice time correction with a given slice order during
> pre-processing: prepro
slice time correction is not used by default
On 01/28/2016 01:16 PM, Rodriguez-Thompson, Anais wrote:
> Hi Freesurfer experts,
>
> I just starting using slice time correction with a given slice order during
> pre-processing: preproc-sess -s GDDA001 -surface fsaverage lhrh -mni305 -so
> siemens -
yes
doug
Rita Loiotile wrote:
> For an odd number of slices- e.g. 45- would it just be
> 1,3,5,...,45,2,4,...,44 for the Siemens default?
>
> On 2/9/11, Douglas N Greve wrote:
>
>> For Siemens with an even number of slices, it is generally
>> 2,4,6,..30,1,3,...29. This changes if there is an o
For an odd number of slices- e.g. 45- would it just be
1,3,5,...,45,2,4,...,44 for the Siemens default?
On 2/9/11, Douglas N Greve wrote:
> For Siemens with an even number of slices, it is generally
> 2,4,6,..30,1,3,...29. This changes if there is an odd number of slices.
>
> doug
>
> Rita Loioti
For Siemens with an even number of slices, it is generally
2,4,6,..30,1,3,...29. This changes if there is an odd number of slices.
doug
Rita Loiotile wrote:
> If my BOLD scan has 30 slices in "interleaved" series, can I assume
> the slice order is 1,3,5,7,9...29,2,4,6,8..30? In other words,
> 1
Hi Rita,
I would not automatically assume that regarding slice ordering with
"interleaved" acquisitions, as I don't think that there is necessarily
any "standard" that different manufacturers are committed to following.
It is actually a non-trivial issue -- e.g., how do scanner choices
regarding a
