Re: [Freesurfer] question about aseg.mgz

2016-07-02 Thread Bruce Fischl
just visually. If we knew a way to automatically check it we would use that to correct it :) On Sat, 2 Jul 2016, Jasmin Alves wrote: Hi Bruce, Thank you for clarifying, this makes more sense, is there a way to check the subcortical segmentation?  Thanks! Jasmin  On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 7:28 PM

Re: [Freesurfer] question about aseg.mgz

2016-07-02 Thread Jasmin Alves
Hi Bruce, Thank you for clarifying, this makes more sense, is there a way to check the subcortical segmentation? Thanks! Jasmin On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi Jasmin > > the norm.mgz isn't a voxel labeling - it's an intensity volume. We > typically check the aseg.mgz

Re: [Freesurfer] question about aseg.mgz

2016-07-02 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Jasmin the norm.mgz isn't a voxel labeling - it's an intensity volume. We typically check the aseg.mgz display *over* the norm.mgz to see if the labels make sense w.r.t. the intensities. cheers Bruce On Sat, 2 Jul 2016, Jasmin Alves wrote: Dear Freesurfer support, I noticed in previous

Re: [Freesurfer] Question about aseg.mgz

2007-08-08 Thread Bruce Fischl
use mri_convert and apply the talairach.xfm (-at I think). Make sure to use nearest nbr resampling for the aseg. On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, jorge luis wrote: Hello all Are the norm.mgz and aseg.mgz volumes already aligned to talairach standard space ? I have read on the freesurfer tutorial that th