- Original Message -
From: "Joshua Lee"
To: "Freesurfer support list"
Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 8:03:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields on 1.5 Tesla
Thanks for the clarification Eugenio. Would saying that it relies on shape
instead of surface be more ac
uot;
> To: "Freesurfer support list"
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 2:10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields on 1.5 Tesla
>
>
>
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Typically subfields segmentation requires hi-resolution data (e.g. 0.4 x
> 0.4 mm in-p
support list"
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 2:10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields on 1.5 Tesla
>
>
>
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Typically subfields segmentation requires hi-resolution data (e.g. 0.4 x
> 0.4 mm in-plane resolution). The thickness of a C
-oharra: www.bcbl.eu/legal-disclaimer
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua Lee"
To: "Freesurfer support list"
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 2:10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields on 1.5 Tesla
Hi Alan,
Typically subfields segmentation requires hi-
Hi Joshua:
Thanks for the input. Very helpful.
Alan
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Typically subfields segmentation requires hi-resolution data (e.g. 0.4 x
> 0.4 mm in-plane resolution). The thickness of a CA subfield typically range
> between 0.5-1.00 mm, b
Hi Alan,
Typically subfields segmentation requires hi-resolution data (e.g. 0.4 x
0.4 mm in-plane resolution). The thickness of a CA subfield typically range
between 0.5-1.00 mm, but 1.5 T data does not achieve sub-millimeter
resolutions. Further, subfield segmentation typically requires
high-cont
