Re: [Freesurfer] GLM analysis on CBF maps

2015-06-03 Thread Douglas N Greve
Continue with what you have done, do not model it as a continuous variable. doug On 06/02/2015 04:03 PM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote: > Dear Experts, > > I have run GLM group analyses with Freesurfer tools according DODS > model, with six classes ((Male,Female) ; (Control,Left,Right)) and one > age

Re: [Freesurfer] GLM analysis on CBF maps

2015-06-02 Thread Matthieu Vanhoutte
Dear Experts, I have run GLM group analyses with Freesurfer tools according DODS model, with six classes ((Male,Female) ; (Control,Left,Right)) and one age variable : /Class MaleControl Class MaleLeft Class MaleRight Class FemaleControl Class FemaleLeft Class FemaleRight Variables Age /Howev

Re: [Freesurfer] GLM analysis on CBF maps

2015-03-12 Thread Douglas Greve
For the intercept, you are testing for a difference in the mean CBF between the groups regressing out the effects of gender and age. For the slope, you are testing for an interaction between group and age regressing out the effects of gender. doug On 3/12/15 1:30 PM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote

Re: [Freesurfer] GLM analysis on CBF maps

2015-03-12 Thread Matthieu Vanhoutte
Hello, I have run GLM group analyses with Freesurfer tools according DODS model, with six classes ((Male,Female) ; (Control,Left,Right)) and one age variable : *Class MaleControlClass MaleLeftClass MaleRightClass FemaleControlClass FemaleLeftClass FemaleRightVariables Age * I wanted to tes

Re: [Freesurfer] GLM analysis on CBF maps

2015-03-11 Thread Douglas N Greve
the sig value is actually -log10(p)*sign(gamma) where gamma is the contrast (gamma.mgh). The p-value is two-tailed, and the color indicates what tail you are on. doug On 03/10/2015 01:21 PM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote: > Dear FreeSurfer's experts, > > I have launched a GLM analyses following