Re: [Freesurfer] DODS/DOSS choice in patient/control study

2009-01-26 Thread Michael Harms
e that age is not a > > significant factor in this analysis? > > > > Any comments and corrections welcomed. > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Rysia > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Harms [mailto:mha...@conte.wustl.edu] &g

Re: [Freesurfer] DODS/DOSS choice in patient/control study

2009-01-22 Thread Douglas N Greve
2009 15:01 To: Burmicz, Ryzarda Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] DODS/DOSS choice in patient/control study Hello Rysia, I'll add a comment by calling your attention to one statistical "subtlety". When using a DODS ("separate slopes") model i

RE: [Freesurfer] DODS/DOSS choice in patient/control study

2009-01-20 Thread Burmicz, Ryzarda
e- From: Michael Harms [mailto:mha...@conte.wustl.edu] Sent: 13 January 2009 15:01 To: Burmicz, Ryzarda Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] DODS/DOSS choice in patient/control study Hello Rysia, I'll add a comment by calling your attention to one statistical

Re: [Freesurfer] DODS/DOSS choice in patient/control study

2009-01-13 Thread Michael Harms
Hello Rysia, I'll add a comment by calling your attention to one statistical "subtlety". When using a DODS ("separate slopes") model in the presence of a continuous covariate, and then examining the significance of the group effect, the interpretation (and results) depend critically on the meani