RE: [Freesurfer] Changing from 1.4x1.4x1.4 mm slices to 1x1x1

2009-03-18 Thread Michael Harms
t; To: jsad...@hotmail.com > > CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Changing from 1.4x1.4x1.4 mm slices to > 1x1x1 > > > > Hi Jeff, > > > > are you intending to combine them into a single study? This can be > > problematic as you&#

RE: [Freesurfer] Changing from 1.4x1.4x1.4 mm slices to 1x1x1

2009-03-18 Thread Bruce Fischl
wiki I can read about how to error check for these problems? Thank you, Jeff Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:39:34 -0400 From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu To: jsad...@hotmail.com CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Changing from 1.4x1.4x1.4 mm slices to 1x1x1 Hi Jeff, are you

RE: [Freesurfer] Changing from 1.4x1.4x1.4 mm slices to 1x1x1

2009-03-17 Thread Jeff Sadino
: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Changing from 1.4x1.4x1.4 mm slices to 1x1x1 > > Hi Jeff, > > are you intending to combine them into a single study? This can be > problematic as you'll get differential sensitivity and possibly bias. > > cheer

Re: [Freesurfer] Changing from 1.4x1.4x1.4 mm slices to 1x1x1

2009-03-17 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Jeff, are you intending to combine them into a single study? This can be problematic as you'll get differential sensitivity and possibly bias. cheers, Bruce On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Jeff Sadino wrote: Hello, I am analyzing some subjects from several years ago when we had a protocol that c