Re: N3 options (was: [Freesurfer] parameters for N3 correction)

2006-11-03 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Bruce, On 3. Nov 2006, at 21:43 Uhr, Bruce Fischl wrote: feel free to put one on our drop site Great offer; I am uploading test.tar.bz2 (onto surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/incoming) which contains a T1.mgz (in test/mri) and all surfaces (in test/surf). I reduced the set to those fi

Re: N3 options (was: [Freesurfer] parameters for N3 correction)

2006-11-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
feel free to put one on our drop site On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Sebastian Moeller wrote: Hi Bruce, On 3. Nov 2006, at 20:33 Uhr, Bruce Fischl wrote: do you mean single channel surface coils? Can you get decent surfaces out of that kind of data??? Well, yes, and that depends on the definition of

Re: N3 options (was: [Freesurfer] parameters for N3 correction)

2006-11-03 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Bruce, On 3. Nov 2006, at 20:33 Uhr, Bruce Fischl wrote: do you mean single channel surface coils? Can you get decent surfaces out of that kind of data??? Well, yes, and that depends on the definition of decency. Joking aside, it requires ship-loads of manual intervention (think manually

Re: N3 options (was: [Freesurfer] parameters for N3 correction)

2006-11-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
do you mean single channel surface coils? Can you get decent surfaces out of that kind of data??? On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Sebastian Moeller wrote: Hi List, On 3. Nov 2006, at 19:48 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 10 Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:48:18 -0500 From: Nick Schmansky <[EMAIL PROTEC

N3 options (was: [Freesurfer] parameters for N3 correction)

2006-11-03 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi List, On 3. Nov 2006, at 19:48 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 10 Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:48:18 -0500 From: Nick Schmansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] parameters for N3 correction To: Chacko Cherian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Freesurfer Mailing List Message-ID: <[E