Re: [Freesurfer] very bad result using "mris_ca_train" and "mris_ca_label"

2018-10-09 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Maedeh the surface file should be the one that defines the common coordinate system (usually sphere.reg) and the annotation should refer to a file in the subject's label dir. Every subject in your list must have both files. cheers Bruce On Tue, 9 Oct 2018, Maedeh Khalilian wrote:  

[Freesurfer] very bad result using "mris_ca_train" and "mris_ca_label"

2018-10-09 Thread Maedeh Khalilian
External Email - Use Caution Dear Dr.Bruce Fischl Thank you very much for your great sense of responsibility. Sure, i have sent you a zip file named "Maedeh_results"(it was a rather big sized one so i had to send it through Wetranser). Hope you have received it. However, a general

Re: [Freesurfer] very bad result using "mris_ca_train" and "mris_ca_label"

2018-10-08 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Maedeh what does the annotation file LDestrieux200 look like? If you apply it to the subject test1 does it work? if you want to send us that subject dir and the lh.LDestrieux200.annot and lh.Destrieux200.gcs files we will take a look cheers Bruce p.s. sorry for missing your email the fir

[Freesurfer] very bad result using "mris_ca_train" and "mris_ca_label"

2018-10-08 Thread Maedeh Khalilian
External Email - Use Caution Dear Freesurfer experts, I am using "mris_divide_parcellation" in order to increase the region numbers of Freesurfer parcellation output using "recon-all". e.g i have a 200-region parcellation.Now i wanna use "mris_ca_train" and this .annot file as

[Freesurfer] very bad result using "mris_ca_train" and "mris_ca_label"

2018-10-06 Thread Maedeh Khalilian
External Email - Use Caution Dear Freesurfer experts, I am using "mris_divide_parcellation" in order to increase the region numbers of Freesurfer parcellation output using "recon-all". e.g i have a 200-region parcellation.Now i wanna use "mris_ca_train" and this .annot file as